Regarding the long-term value of cryptocurrencies, there is an interesting perspective: it is both a potential hedge tool within the US dollar hegemony system and a new medium for energy storage and transfer. Currently, as AI and POW mining compete for the same computational resources and electricity, this contradiction actually reinforces the fundamental demand for encrypted networks—competition for scarce energy will only make both ecosystems more efficient.
From the current situation of electricity shortages and token scarcity, the underlying long-term bullish logic remains valid. This is not about solving short-term transaction issues but addressing a fundamental belief problem: as resources become increasingly tight, the value certainty of POW will be re-evaluated. No matter how the market fluctuates, practitioners' confidence stems from this macro inevitability, not market sentiment.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiTooHigh
· 8h ago
Energy competition has actually increased the necessity of POW, I buy into this logic... but to be honest, I'm still struggling with electricity bills right now.
View OriginalReply0
defi_detective
· 8h ago
Energy competition is actually a positive, I buy into this logic. POW is about thriving and creating value in the gaps.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 8h ago
Energy competition instead validates the necessity of POW; I agree with this logic.
---
The dual attributes of USD hedging + energy carrier; no wonder institutions are quietly accumulating.
---
In an era of power shortages, whoever controls energy controls the future; this is the key.
---
The issue of faith is spot on; market sentiment is just noise, the underlying logic is the real gold.
---
AI and mining compete for resources? It's like two opponents simultaneously driving up venue rent, and the beneficiaries are the landlords.
---
From the perspective of macro inevitability in the crypto world, this angle is fresh; most people are still watching K-line charts.
---
Resource scarcity = revaluation of POW value; simple and straightforward, I like this idea.
---
It's not about solving short-term trading issues, but about solving the faith issue—this sentence hits the point.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 8h ago
From the perspective of energy competition, it's truly unparalleled. POW is about competing for scarcity itself, which is the logic of hard currency.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrince
· 9h ago
Energy competition actually proves the necessity of POW; I buy that logic.
Regarding the long-term value of cryptocurrencies, there is an interesting perspective: it is both a potential hedge tool within the US dollar hegemony system and a new medium for energy storage and transfer. Currently, as AI and POW mining compete for the same computational resources and electricity, this contradiction actually reinforces the fundamental demand for encrypted networks—competition for scarce energy will only make both ecosystems more efficient.
From the current situation of electricity shortages and token scarcity, the underlying long-term bullish logic remains valid. This is not about solving short-term transaction issues but addressing a fundamental belief problem: as resources become increasingly tight, the value certainty of POW will be re-evaluated. No matter how the market fluctuates, practitioners' confidence stems from this macro inevitability, not market sentiment.