2026-01-14 05:30:03

Recently, a major upgrade was completed on a leading public blockchain. According to official data, after the upgrade, its block time was optimized from 0.75 seconds to 0.45 seconds, with a significant improvement in performance metrics.

Meanwhile, another mainstream public blockchain in the industry currently maintains a stable block time of around 0.39 seconds. This means that after the upgrade, the two chains are now quite close in basic performance.

Interestingly, the market has always held different views on the development routes of various public chains. Some projects, in pursuit of extreme speed, make trade-offs in decentralization and rely on professional infrastructure support. This upgrade reflects that, through technical optimization, public chains can maintain their unique features while continuously breaking through performance benchmarks. This is a positive signal for the long-term development of the entire ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Hash_Bandit

· 5h ago

ngl the 0.45s block time is solid, but that 0.39s competitor still got 'em by the nuts... been through enough difficulty epochs to know speed alone doesn't win the war tho

Reply0

SilentObserver

· 5h ago

0.45 seconds? Still a bit slow. The key is whether decentralization has been compromised—that's what players really care about, right?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 5h ago

But between 0.45 seconds and 0.39 seconds, how much does the user actually feel the difference? The key is whether the ecosystem is vibrant enough.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeNightmare

· 5h ago

0.45 seconds? Uh, sounds good, but what about the gas fee? That's what I care about. Sitting around for half an hour late at night is still way too expensive.

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 5h ago

0.45 seconds is still slow. The real bottleneck is not this at all; the ecosystem is the key.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalDetective

· 5h ago

0.45 seconds? Still didn't catch up to 0.39, almost there haha

View OriginalReply0

RealYieldWizard

· 5h ago

Want to compare 0.45 seconds with 0.39 seconds? That's close enough, they're not even on the same level. Although there's progress, is this kind of optimization really that important?

View OriginalReply0