Recently, a widely circulated industry opinion has emerged: as the trading volume balance between DEX and CEX increasingly leans toward decentralization, professional traders face an awkward dilemma—their every large order is broadcast on-chain.
This is no small matter.
**On-Chain Transparency: A Double-Edged Sword**
Imagine you are part of a quantitative team preparing to execute a multi-million dollar trade. On a centralized exchange, this order is handled discreetly, at most visible to the matching engine’s algorithms. But on-chain? Your intent is instantly visible to all nodes, everyone, and all bots.
MEV frontrunning bots can sniff out the trade within 0.1 seconds, queue up in advance, increase slippage, and your execution price directly worsens. Even more painfully, your alpha strategy is systematically compromised—everyone knows what you intend to buy, and the market reacts immediately.
This is what the industry calls the "transparency vulnerability." Transparency itself isn’t wrong, but at a professional trading scale, lacking execution privacy infrastructure significantly offsets the advantages of on-chain liquidity.
**The True Battlefield of Next-Gen Competition**
Currently, DEX battles are all about capturing liquidity—whose TVL is higher, whose fees are lower. But some teams are pondering another question: when DEXs truly handle CEX-level trading volumes, what will the focus of competition shift to?
The answer is the execution layer.
Specifically, it involves completing large, complex, cross-chain orders without exposing trading intent. This presents an opportunity for certain DEXs.
**How Privacy-Preserving Execution Works**
The key is: no black box needed, yet intent remains hidden.
Orders are still settled on-chain, and trade results are still verifiable, but the execution path is obfuscated. Through order splitting, address dispersion, multi-chain routing, and other techniques, on-chain activity appears fragmented—others cannot discern your overall strategy.
This isn’t some new black technology; it’s more about using smarter methods to execute on existing blockchain architectures.
**Why This Approach Will Gain Traction**
As professional funds flood into DEXs in large volumes, their needs become more rigid. The execution privacy promised by certain DEXs can directly translate into cost savings for hedge funds, market makers, high-frequency trading firms, and other big players—lower slippage, more stable strategies.
From an exchange perspective, whoever can execute more effectively and discreetly will attract these serious players. This is a new track.
Honestly, the second half of the DEX era is no longer about competing over TVL or token counts, but about whose execution layer capabilities are stronger and who understands the pain points of large traders better.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DecentralizeMe
· 9h ago
This is exactly what I've been wanting to say all along. How useful is liquidity? Big players still can't get in no matter what, being completely exploited by MEV. By the way, are there any projects actually working on this?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesis
· 9h ago
On-chain data shows that large account order fragmentation submissions are indeed increasing. The 0.1-second MEV window has long been exploited by those bots. The interesting part is that these people are now turning to multi-chain routing... Unsurprisingly, execution privacy is the real necessity.
View OriginalReply0
Ramen_Until_Rich
· 9h ago
Basically, it's still the old MEV problem. As long as on-chain transparency exists, it can't be avoided. Privacy execution sounds good, but how is it actually achieved?
Are front-running bots now so sensitive that they can react within 0.1 seconds?
The logic of DEX competing at the execution layer is correct. Will big players really pay for privacy? It still depends on the costs.
Transparency vulnerabilities are indeed an issue, but can this order splitting method withstand carefully designed attacks?
Honestly, CEX relies on this layer of privacy to operate, and DEXs won't find it so easy to carve out this piece of the cake.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichDetector
· 9h ago
You hit the nail on the head. MEV is like a parasite on the chain; as soon as you make a move, you're sniped.
The real business still has to be done with private execution, otherwise large funds simply won't dare to fully commit on DEX.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 9h ago
Bro, this issue should have been clarified long ago. Big players have been being front-run and drained for a long time.
---
Transparency is transparency, but it can't withstand the 0.1-second sniffing ability of bots. This is just outrageous.
---
It's basically that DEX lacks privacy infrastructure. Right now, CEX can still make money just relying on this.
---
The order splitting routing strategy has been played by someone long ago. The key is who can make it sufficiently fragmented.
---
The real race is still at the execution layer. TVL has already been overhyped; everyone can see through it.
---
If big players can save the little blood sucked by MEV, it's definitely worth switching to DEX, a cost optimization hard metric.
---
The problem is that privacy execution must be done well; doing it poorly is just self-deception.
---
This reshuffle will be very interesting. Let's see who can first turn the execution layer into a moat.
View OriginalReply0
MemeKingNFT
· 9h ago
On-chain live streaming orders? To put it simply, the MEV curse hasn't been solved... I've always said that for DEX to turn around, they need to implement privacy execution layers, but many projects are still just hyping the TVL concept. Wake up, everyone, transparency vulnerabilities are a nightmare for big players.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretful
· 9h ago
Damn, you hit the nail on the head. The black-box operations of CEXs are indeed comfortable, but DEXs are so transparent that it's a bit too much—large traders' orders are immediately sniffed out by the bots.
No wonder recent DEXs are experimenting with privacy features; this is definitely the next battleground. Whoever does this well will be able to capture the funds of the big players.
Recently, a widely circulated industry opinion has emerged: as the trading volume balance between DEX and CEX increasingly leans toward decentralization, professional traders face an awkward dilemma—their every large order is broadcast on-chain.
This is no small matter.
**On-Chain Transparency: A Double-Edged Sword**
Imagine you are part of a quantitative team preparing to execute a multi-million dollar trade. On a centralized exchange, this order is handled discreetly, at most visible to the matching engine’s algorithms. But on-chain? Your intent is instantly visible to all nodes, everyone, and all bots.
MEV frontrunning bots can sniff out the trade within 0.1 seconds, queue up in advance, increase slippage, and your execution price directly worsens. Even more painfully, your alpha strategy is systematically compromised—everyone knows what you intend to buy, and the market reacts immediately.
This is what the industry calls the "transparency vulnerability." Transparency itself isn’t wrong, but at a professional trading scale, lacking execution privacy infrastructure significantly offsets the advantages of on-chain liquidity.
**The True Battlefield of Next-Gen Competition**
Currently, DEX battles are all about capturing liquidity—whose TVL is higher, whose fees are lower. But some teams are pondering another question: when DEXs truly handle CEX-level trading volumes, what will the focus of competition shift to?
The answer is the execution layer.
Specifically, it involves completing large, complex, cross-chain orders without exposing trading intent. This presents an opportunity for certain DEXs.
**How Privacy-Preserving Execution Works**
The key is: no black box needed, yet intent remains hidden.
Orders are still settled on-chain, and trade results are still verifiable, but the execution path is obfuscated. Through order splitting, address dispersion, multi-chain routing, and other techniques, on-chain activity appears fragmented—others cannot discern your overall strategy.
This isn’t some new black technology; it’s more about using smarter methods to execute on existing blockchain architectures.
**Why This Approach Will Gain Traction**
As professional funds flood into DEXs in large volumes, their needs become more rigid. The execution privacy promised by certain DEXs can directly translate into cost savings for hedge funds, market makers, high-frequency trading firms, and other big players—lower slippage, more stable strategies.
From an exchange perspective, whoever can execute more effectively and discreetly will attract these serious players. This is a new track.
Honestly, the second half of the DEX era is no longer about competing over TVL or token counts, but about whose execution layer capabilities are stronger and who understands the pain points of large traders better.