Last night I almost missed a good opportunity. I came across a deposit promotion that at first glance didn't seem special—an 100,000 USDT reward pool distributed roughly as just over 100 dollars per account. I didn't pay much attention to it initially, but then suddenly at 3 a.m. I realized there was a trick in the rules!

After thinking it through carefully, I found that the rewards are distributed at 0.4% of the total token supply. Depositing 10,000 USDT could get you 20,000 BTW tokens. Although the official reference price is given as 0.005 USDT, that’s not the actual opening price. If you calculate based on that, the people who participated in the initial offering only received about 16 USDT? That clearly doesn’t align with the logic of a "quality project."

Once I figured it out, I quickly prepared funds and completed the authorization process. When I made my move this morning, there wasn’t much competition. If BTW’s price performs well at launch, the single-position profit could range between 300-600 USDT.

But this also made me reflect: in the highly volatile crypto market, should we always be on the front lines "seeking opportunities," or should we allocate some reliable, low-effort, stable income sources?

This brought to mind products like Lista DAO. Its logic is completely opposite—no rushing for promotions, no competing for opening prices, but instead relying on the protocol’s own mechanisms to generate returns. You can think of it as "the financial backbone of the crypto world." Users deposit mainstream assets like ETH or BNB, and the system automatically mints stablecoins like lisUSD while earning staking rewards. The entire process is transparent, governed by code, with no tricks or hidden clauses.