2026-01-13 23:23:52

The current state of VR tells a different story than we expected.

Meta's dominance in the Quest ecosystem may actually be holding back real innovation. Once this centralized grip loosens, we'll likely see nimbler, community-driven VR platforms emerge and thrive. Smaller ecosystems often move faster and adapt better to what users actually want.

For development studios, this matters now. Building exclusively for Quest locks you into one platform's roadmap and risk profile. Consider diversifying your tech stack and platform strategy—explore alternative VR platforms and chains that align with your long-term vision.

The future of VR isn't about mega-platforms controlling everything. It's about sustainable, decentralized ecosystems where builders have real autonomy.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkItAllDay

· 9h ago

If this unicorn of meta really lets go, only small teams will have a chance to survive. --- Another decentralization evangelism... But to be honest, multi-platform development is indeed more secure. --- Quest monopoly for a few years is okay, but if it continues, developers will go crazy. --- Decentralized ecosystems sound beautiful, but reality is always a bit disappointing... --- It's a common topic, but the key is who can truly shake meta's position. --- Why does it always feel like this argument has been made a thousand times? --- Small ecosystems are indeed fast, but where the users are is the real key.

View OriginalReply0

GetRichLeek

· 9h ago

Meta's monopoly is indeed frustrating, just like the market manipulators back in the day, retail investors simply can't catch a breath. But the decentralized approach... always sounds so beautiful; on-chain data always tells the truth. --- The lesson from heavy losses is to go all in on one chain. Looking at VR now, it's the same principle—multi-chain configuration is the way to go. --- Wait, are we talking about VR or crypto? Anyway, both are about escaping centralized control. I believe that, but the problem is my money is already in Bitcoin. --- Super platform monopolies do a lot of harm; a new player should have come to shake things up long ago. Unfortunately, bottom-fishing is never that easy. --- Decentralized ecosystems, they sound just like my expectations for every surge... too idealistic, brother. --- Diverse strategies among developers are correct, but how many alternative platforms can truly survive? Everyone has FOMO, but surviving is not easy.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-6bc33122

· 9h ago

Wow, Meta's monopoly stance is really impressive. With Quest dominating, no one dares to challenge it. Wait, can decentralized VR really take off? It still feels too idealistic. Developers are now stuck, multi-chain deployment costs are too high. Small platforms are indeed flexible, but without a thriving ecosystem, it's all pointless. The prospects of blockchain VR really depend on applications. Right now, there's nothing at all.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 9h ago

NGL, Meta's monopoly has long been overdue to be broken, and smaller platforms are actually more resilient.

View OriginalReply0

SilentObserver

· 9h ago

Meta's monopoly is indeed disgusting, but honestly, small platforms aren't doing much better... Here we go again, promoting decentralization. Does the crypto circle really work that way? Wait, who will bear the cost of multi-chain deployment for developers? Quest may have a monopoly, but the user base is there. Small platforms, no matter how flexible, are just playing catch-up. It sounds nice, but in reality, they just want a share of the pie. VR is like this now. Whoever changes the status quo, I’ll see who it is. If there were real alternatives, they would have emerged long ago. Talking more is just pointless. The off-topic remarks about bottom-fishing small platforms are worth pondering, though. I agree that Meta stifles innovation, but the solution doesn't seem that simple.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationTherapist

· 9h ago

Oh man, Meta has really taken over the entire VR ecosystem this time. With such a monopoly, who would still want to innovate? Honestly, smaller platforms are definitely more flexible. The bureaucratic style of big corporations is truly stifling. Development teams should not go all-in on Quest anymore; they need to diversify risk, brothers. Decentralized VR? Sounds good, but it still feels far off.

View OriginalReply0