Current social platforms have captured all user connections, content, and interaction data, then used it to make money. Web3 social circles have been advocating for returning data sovereignty to users, but the real challenge is clear: social data is large in volume, updates frequently, and is dynamically changing, making storage costs and management complexity a nightmare. A protocol is attempting to solve this fundamental problem—it aims to become the infrastructure for the next generation of decentralized social networks.
From platform control to true ownership
Imagine this scenario: every post you make, every like, and every relationship link exists on a network in encrypted, verifiable data form, with your wallet private key serving as proof of ownership. Social applications can update and iterate at any time, but your social graph and content assets are always in your hands. You can migrate to any new platform at will. This is true disruption of the platform’s data monopoly wall.
Dynamic management is no longer a luxury
Social data is inherently alive—editing posts, deleting updates, following or unfollowing. The core feature of such protocols is "programmable storage," enabling these dynamic operations. Through smart contracts, you can set various complex rules (e.g., "only mutual followers can see"), and executing these rules involves data change costs that are ridiculously low. Only then can a fully functional, responsive social experience be built, making economic sense.
Social finance has a reliable foundation
When social data truly becomes user-controlled assets, the imagination space for Social-Fi opens up. Creators can tokenize and sell high-quality paid content or community subscription rights via smart contract tokens; users’ attention and influence can be more fairly measured and incentivized. These innovations all require an underlying architecture capable of handling massive data and implementing fine-grained permission controls.
Such solutions are being used by a group of developers to build decentralized versions of Twitter, Xiaohongshu, and short video platforms. Keep an eye on this trend to see how the value flow in the era of data sovereignty will be reshaped.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RetroHodler91
· 7h ago
Sounds good, but how is the gas fee calculated? Can regular users really afford to use it?
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 7h ago
Honestly, I've heard enough to get calluses on my ears... How many of these can really be implemented?
---
Cost issues are indeed a trap, but if you ask me, there's an even bigger pit ahead.
---
Sounds great, but when it comes to actually using this stuff, will the gas fees be sky-high again?
---
Data sovereignty sounds good, but will users really manage it themselves... It's too complicated.
---
Hmm, these protocols are quite interesting, but whether they will be widely adopted is another matter.
---
Another bunch of idealistic promises; let's see if they can really last more than two years.
---
Social financialization sounds good, but the key is having real users, otherwise everything is just a mirage.
---
This idea isn't new anymore; the hard part is figuring out how to make it easy for ordinary people to use without headaches.
View OriginalReply0
0xLuckbox
· 7h ago
Sounds good, but can they really solve all those cost issues? It still depends on who can afford it in the end.
---
Decentralized social media has been talked about for years, but I haven't seen a product that can compete...
---
The idea of data sovereignty sounds too idealistic. What about UX experience? Would average users care?
---
It depends on how this protocol is governed. It might end up being just another centralized monster.
---
Social data itself is valuable; the key is whether users can make money from it. Just decentralized storage—what's the use?
---
If you lose your private key, your entire social assets are gone. Who will bear this risk?
---
Makes sense, but I still want to see a demo first. I'm tired of armchair strategizing.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStruggler
· 7h ago
Sounds good, but how many of these can actually be implemented? I've heard similar promises before, but in the end, it's just a mess.
It really makes me manage data sovereignty... gas fees could kill me.
It's easy to say, but when has this ever been more than a PowerPoint presentation?
View OriginalReply0
MentalWealthHarvester
· 7h ago
It sounds ideal, but can those storage costs really be reduced to "absurd" lows... I haven't seen reliable data yet.
If this plan can really be implemented, Social-Fi wouldn't still be so cold.
Data sovereignty sounds great, but can the user experience be improved instead of dragging it down?
The real test is whether TPS and costs can reach the levels of Twitter and Xiaohongshu.
Another bunch of protocols claiming to solve the problem, I just want to see who really gets this thing done.
Current social platforms have captured all user connections, content, and interaction data, then used it to make money. Web3 social circles have been advocating for returning data sovereignty to users, but the real challenge is clear: social data is large in volume, updates frequently, and is dynamically changing, making storage costs and management complexity a nightmare. A protocol is attempting to solve this fundamental problem—it aims to become the infrastructure for the next generation of decentralized social networks.
From platform control to true ownership
Imagine this scenario: every post you make, every like, and every relationship link exists on a network in encrypted, verifiable data form, with your wallet private key serving as proof of ownership. Social applications can update and iterate at any time, but your social graph and content assets are always in your hands. You can migrate to any new platform at will. This is true disruption of the platform’s data monopoly wall.
Dynamic management is no longer a luxury
Social data is inherently alive—editing posts, deleting updates, following or unfollowing. The core feature of such protocols is "programmable storage," enabling these dynamic operations. Through smart contracts, you can set various complex rules (e.g., "only mutual followers can see"), and executing these rules involves data change costs that are ridiculously low. Only then can a fully functional, responsive social experience be built, making economic sense.
Social finance has a reliable foundation
When social data truly becomes user-controlled assets, the imagination space for Social-Fi opens up. Creators can tokenize and sell high-quality paid content or community subscription rights via smart contract tokens; users’ attention and influence can be more fairly measured and incentivized. These innovations all require an underlying architecture capable of handling massive data and implementing fine-grained permission controls.
Such solutions are being used by a group of developers to build decentralized versions of Twitter, Xiaohongshu, and short video platforms. Keep an eye on this trend to see how the value flow in the era of data sovereignty will be reshaped.