There's a very interesting phenomenon——we already have highly efficient public chains, the DeFi ecosystem is mature enough, and NFT and blockchain games are emerging one after another. But how many applications can truly survive and achieve long-term growth? Sadly, very few.



Why?

Think carefully, and the problem is actually stuck in a easily overlooked area: data storage. The costs are too high, and applications simply can't afford it.

Traditional Web3 solutions, when handling large-scale data, have storage costs that eat up most of the project’s budget. This is no small matter—it directly determines whether an application can be scaled and implemented. No matter how fast the public chain is or how creative the application, if data can't be stored, everything is just empty talk.

Seeing this long-ignored pain point, Walrus Protocol has turned its focus to the blank space of decentralized data layers. Its approach is very clear: instead of competing with public chains on throughput or fighting for users with applications, it focuses on doing one thing well—using underlying technical solutions like erasure coding to significantly reduce storage costs while maintaining security and decentralization.

When data is no longer a burden and costs are no longer astronomical, applications can truly scale. From this perspective, solutions like data layers are not just a bonus for Web3, but an essential infrastructure.

With it, the ecosystem can move upward. Without it, innovation will always be trapped.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWatchervip
· 01-16 13:05
Storage costs are indeed the hidden killer; I hadn't thought about it before. If I had known the app would die so quickly, I wouldn't have been able to justify the economics. Is Walrus's erasure coding approach reliable? Are there projects actually using it? Honestly, it's all about the money—nothing else.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaservip
· 01-14 08:36
Erasure coding has long deserved more attention; the storage cost barrier has indeed stifled many good projects.
View OriginalReply0
ChainDetectivevip
· 01-13 23:50
Storage costs are really underestimated; no wonder so many projects don't survive beyond the first year.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidatorvip
· 01-13 23:49
Storage costs are indeed the hidden killer, you're right.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThricevip
· 01-13 23:48
Wow, someone finally said it. The storage cost has really been seriously underestimated.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watchervip
· 01-13 23:48
Storage costs are really an invisible killer; I didn't realize this was such a bottleneck before. --- Basically, it's still about infrastructure being insufficient; having speed alone isn't enough. --- The idea of Walrus indeed hits the pain point; is the erasure coding scheme reliable? --- I feel this is the real problem that needs solving—not just another application, but addressing the core issue of the application. --- If the data layer is well-established, the subsequent applications can truly thrive; this logic makes sense. --- Wait, how high are storage costs exactly? Are there specific data? --- I believe in this direction; it's much more meaningful than projects that survive solely on hype. --- No wonder so many applications fail quickly—they're all drained by storage costs. --- I'm not focusing on technical details for now; I just think finally someone is taking this problem seriously. --- Decentralized data layer is indeed a blank spot; whoever does it first will win.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrinevip
· 01-13 23:37
Storage costs are indeed a black hole, and people have been complaining about it for a long time. Whether Walrus's approach is correct or not is another story, but it definitely hits the pain point. --- Both storage and erasure coding sound very professional, but how truly affordable can they be? --- In simple terms, current applications simply can't afford the data fees. If only we knew that public chain speed wasn't a bottleneck. --- This is what Web3 truly lacks, not another chain or another DEX. --- Erasure coding technology sounds impressive, but how quickly it can be implemented is questionable. --- Spot on. The high cost of storage hasn't really caused much noise, but it has killed quite a few projects. --- If costs can really be brought down, that would be revolutionary. Right now, everyone is hyping application innovation, but the underlying infrastructure is terribly broken.
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoardervip
· 01-13 23:25
Hey, storage costs have indeed been overlooked all along. No wonder so many projects die halfway through.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)