2026-01-13 21:24:04

FLOW's recent actions have sparked deep reflection within the industry. The project team has yet to provide a clear explanation for the issuance increase, and instead, they directly used others' assets through special permissions. These details are indeed worth noting:

First, transferring funds without a private key—this breaks the fundamental logic of blockchain. Such operations are typically taboo in the industry, yet they have become a reality.

Second, when a partner raised a genuine concern, instead of engaging in dialogue, the assets were frozen. This response is even more perplexing.

Third, the project team bypassed formal procedures and exercised the freezing authority on their own. Legal processes are in place, but they chose a shortcut.

This series of actions has led many token holders to reevaluate FLOW's mechanism design and governance logic.

FLOW3,46%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

InscriptionGriller

· 4h ago

No private key needed for transfer? This isn't a permission system; it's a blatant money-grabbing scheme. Wait, partners dare to question and get frozen? Is the project team educating the market on how to respect them? By bypassing the process and freezing themselves, I see this as the new generation teaching the old. Your operation is really a bit shaky. Damn, such incidents still happen, indicating that the underlying design never considered constraints. FLOW's move this time truly redefines what "decentralization" means. Not even using people's private keys, I just want to ask: what else do you need? This partner is really brave; questioning gets you frozen. If I had this authority, I would have been thrilled long ago. Project team: Legal procedures? I am the law myself! Transfers without private keys—this was unheard of a few years ago, now it's routine. The crypto world is truly changing day by day. I just want to see what the current mindset of FLOW holders is; it should be quite interesting.

View OriginalReply0

CoinCircleAFlower

· 21h ago

Flow is a Trump-style approach, directly grabbing faster than anything else. It also pioneers a new way of playing; in the future, any platform that dares to join, no one can guarantee that they won't be the next to be snatched away.

View OriginalReply0

SpeakWithHatOn

· 22h ago

Wow, no private key needed to transfer directly? What kind of blockchain is this? Isn't this just centralized?

View OriginalReply0

Liquidated_Larry

· 22h ago

Wow, this move is really awesome. FLOW has directly understood centralized operations, and once the blockchain's outer layer is removed, it's just the traditional finance system.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirter

· 22h ago

Is this still called decentralization? Using others' assets directly, that's a joke. FLOW's operation is really incredible—being able to transfer without a private key? What's the point of holding my coins then? The problem is, if someone questions it, they get directly frozen. Who would believe that? I heard the project team even bypassed legal procedures to freeze assets themselves. What do they think token holders are? Honestly, it's just too much power concentrated. The governance logic of FLOW should have been overthrown long ago. It feels like they're setting a precedent for the future of certain projects—too dangerous. Luckily, I got out quickly. With this momentum, it's only a matter of time before it crashes.

View OriginalReply0

FrogInTheWell