2026-01-13 20:40:27

The community is stepping up with constructive feedback to shape this $100 billion application's future. When thousands of users unite around a shared vision, things move fast. Real adoption comes from real voices—developers, traders, and hodlers pushing for features that matter. This is what separates thriving ecosystems from the rest: a community that doesn't just hold, but actively participates in building. We're not just users here; we're the backbone.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DefiPlaybook

· 3h ago

According to on-chain data, the TVL growth of such projects often stems from community consensus, but it's important to note—it's easy to shout slogans, while actual implementation is far more challenging than expected.

View OriginalReply0

PretendingSerious

· 11h ago

That's true, but the reality is that most people are just here to harvest profits, and there aren't that many genuine builders.

View OriginalReply0

WalletAnxietyPatient

· 01-15 09:21

Oh wow, well said! That's the true spirit of DAO. But I'm still a bit worried—what if the community voting goes wrong... A hundred billion project, really relying on us to push it? Feeling a bit overwhelmed.

View OriginalReply0

CommunitySlacker

· 01-13 21:10

Hi, really? A 10 billion project still relies on community crowdsourced testing?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 01-13 21:09

The community's voice is the future, but why does it still feel like many people are just watching?

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 01-13 21:07

Community voices are indeed important, but can they really drive change? It still feels like the big whales have the final say.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainTalker

· 01-13 21:07

actually, let's break this down—the premise here conflates community participation with meaningful governance, which empirically isn't always the case. think of it like the agora in ancient athens: everyone had a voice, but did everyone move the needle? caveat emptor on that "backbone" framing tbh

Reply0

MemecoinTrader

· 01-13 21:05

ngl the "we're the backbone" narrative hits different when you map the sentiment velocity here—classic pre-rally consensus building

Reply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 01-13 20:55

You've heard a lot about community governance, but how many have actually been implemented? Anyway, I haven't seen any substantial changes.

View OriginalReply0