Top universities' investment decisions have also taken a big hit. It is reported that a well-known university once followed the trend by adopting a Nobel laureate's crypto investment strategy, resulting in losses of over $6 billion during the crypto market downturn, and subsequently had to cut back on liberal arts programs to make up the shortfall.
Interestingly, this university's total assets are approximately $21 billion. If a $6 billion loss truly prompted a major adjustment in academic focus, the underlying financial logic is worth questioning. On one hand, it reflects that even top-tier institutions find it difficult to manage the high volatility of the crypto market; on the other hand, it exposes the dangers of over-concentrating high-risk investments in asset allocation.
This case serves as a reminder to institutional investors: celebrity endorsements do not equal a safety cushion. While crypto assets offer great opportunities, risk management and position control are always the first lessons.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleInTraining
· 3h ago
Nobel laureates also face setbacks, what does this say... Following the trend is death
The crypto world is too deep, even celebrity halos can't block it
6 billion loss cuts liberal arts? This logic seems a bit absurd
This is the price of greed; diversification is really important
Playing with coins depends on yourself, don't believe all the sweet talk from big shots
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 10h ago
Nobel laureates are not market prediction machines; following the trend will cost you tuition.
---
$6 billion loss and cutting liberal arts? That logic really doesn't hold...
---
Celebrity endorsements in the crypto world are just a joke; investments without risk control are all gambling.
---
Top institutions crashing indicates that no one in the crypto market can fully grasp it; proper position management is the key.
---
It's funny that universities still blame academic adjustments for this; they should really reflect on their investment processes.
---
This tells you that even smart people can stumble in high-risk assets.
---
With a total asset of 21 billion, are you still afraid of 6 billion? Either the numbers are fake or the decision-making is truly poor.
---
The biggest trap in the crypto world is the celebrity effect; those following the trend will all pay tuition.
---
Crypto investments offer high returns but also high risks; if you lack risk control awareness, don't get involved.
---
Universities have become leek farmers, and they even have to use students' futures as collateral...
View OriginalReply0
Tokenomics911
· 10h ago
Nobel laureates also fail, which shows that you shouldn't believe anything, only trust your own risk management
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 10h ago
Nobel laureates also suffer losses, this is the most ironic part
---
60 billion loss directly cuts liberal arts? That's funny, it shows that insiders have long wanted to do this
---
Celebrity effect is really so powerful, even top universities can't defend against it
---
The outcome of following the trend in investments, the same throughout history and across the world
---
So, no matter how smart you are, you can't outsmart the market
---
Liberal arts got caught in the crossfire, who to blame? Still have to blame investment decisions
---
Can't even withstand a 60 billion pullback with 21 billion? The logic is really absurd
---
This move is a textbook-level negative example
---
Cryptocurrency ultimately still has too much gambling element
---
Top institutions also have to pay tuition fees, no one can escape this disaster
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 10h ago
Nobel laureates also get caught up in scandals; this is just outrageous.
Greed is truly the root of all evil... 6 billion just gets cut off on a whim. Honestly, I think this university never had a clear plan from the start.
The celebrity effect really needs to die; jumping into the crypto world just deserves to get wrecked.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 10h ago
Haha, Nobel laureates also get into trouble, this is unbelievable
---
60 billion is gone just like that, even if you have money, it doesn't help
---
Celebrity effect, huh, it can be deadly
---
No wonder everyone now says not to follow the trend blindly, this lesson is too costly
---
Speaking of 210 billion, it's still so fragile? Feels like there are issues with financial management
---
The pitfalls in the crypto world are so deep, no matter how famous someone is, they can't dig their way out
---
What does this show? Even elites can't handle the crypto market
---
All liberal arts projects are being cut, this decision is really hasty
---
So, the key is risk control; no investment is completely safe
View OriginalReply0
screenshot_gains
· 10h ago
Nobel laureates also face setbacks, this is going to be interesting haha
---
6 billion lost, and they’re still cutting liberal arts? Something doesn’t feel right
---
Celebrities endorse and dare to go all in, their brains are really...
---
University investing is like gambling, can’t smile about it
---
Heard of being cut after following the trend, but never heard of being cut like this after following the trend
---
I just can’t understand this logic, really
---
The crypto market is like this, it’s the same for everyone
---
Losing 6 billion and then cutting liberal arts, they’re just shifting blame
---
Even experts hit pitfalls sometimes, risk management is the most important
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologist
· 10h ago
Nobel laureates also get into trouble, showing that there are no absolute big shots in the crypto world.
---
A $6 billion loss, and they cut liberal arts? What's going on, is all the money burned on the chain?
---
Now it's all good, even the top-tier copycat investors can face a blowout. Who can we trust as retail investors?
---
Celebrity endorsements are really the biggest trap. Looks like I need to learn to read K-line charts myself.
---
How can $21 billion in total assets be hit so hard by $6 billion? This university's risk control is truly slack to the extreme.
---
Wake up, everyone. High education ≠ high financial IQ. This case is really well written.
---
Another story of "I don't understand but I trust the big shots." Exactly.
---
It's hard to hold, the crypto world only needs one cycle of decline to expose many problems.
---
Position control is always the first lesson. This is spot on, but unfortunately too few people know it.
Top universities' investment decisions have also taken a big hit. It is reported that a well-known university once followed the trend by adopting a Nobel laureate's crypto investment strategy, resulting in losses of over $6 billion during the crypto market downturn, and subsequently had to cut back on liberal arts programs to make up the shortfall.
Interestingly, this university's total assets are approximately $21 billion. If a $6 billion loss truly prompted a major adjustment in academic focus, the underlying financial logic is worth questioning. On one hand, it reflects that even top-tier institutions find it difficult to manage the high volatility of the crypto market; on the other hand, it exposes the dangers of over-concentrating high-risk investments in asset allocation.
This case serves as a reminder to institutional investors: celebrity endorsements do not equal a safety cushion. While crypto assets offer great opportunities, risk management and position control are always the first lessons.