I’ve pondered a question for a long time—why do Web3 applications that have sound logic and decent products always fail to grow big? It wasn’t until a certain moment that I realized: the bottleneck isn’t in the code or market conditions, but in a neglected blind spot—data storage uncertainty.
In the early stages of a project, this issue doesn’t seem apparent at all. With few users, small data volumes, and short lifecycles, everything is well concealed. No one cares if images are stored on centralized servers, and no one questions the behavior records in off-chain databases. Everyone knows that these kinds of projects probably won’t go far. But once you truly aim to turn it into a long-term product, this logic immediately collapses.
I found a clear dividing line—the moment the application starts consuming historical data. Blockchain games need to preserve players’ long-term progress, content platforms need to accumulate creator assets, and AI applications need to repeatedly call models and training data. Once these data become the lifeblood of the system, you can no longer treat them as external resources that can be replaced at any time. At this stage, storage issues will snowball into an uncontrollable problem.
The uncertainty I’m talking about here isn’t about security risks, but more tangible hidden dangers: Will the service suddenly go down? Will it be unilaterally interrupted? Will it be secretly altered when you have no control? Centralized solutions inherently carry this risk.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHero
· 7h ago
Well said, this is exactly the point I've been wanting to make.
Data storage is truly the silent killer of Web3; no one wants to talk about it, but it's unavoidable.
Everyone understands the principle, but the key is that there are hardly any reliable decentralized storage solutions available now.
If you want to grow big, you have to solve this problem, or else even the best ideas are useless.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434
· 7h ago
Damn, at the end of the day, it's still that centralized, crappy system.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainArchaeologist
· 7h ago
Wow, that's exactly right. Data storage is indeed the Achilles' heel of Web3.
Basically, those projects are betting that service providers won't drop the ball. It's so ironic.
I'm really convinced by the period when historical data became the bloodline; many projects fail right there.
I’ve pondered a question for a long time—why do Web3 applications that have sound logic and decent products always fail to grow big? It wasn’t until a certain moment that I realized: the bottleneck isn’t in the code or market conditions, but in a neglected blind spot—data storage uncertainty.
In the early stages of a project, this issue doesn’t seem apparent at all. With few users, small data volumes, and short lifecycles, everything is well concealed. No one cares if images are stored on centralized servers, and no one questions the behavior records in off-chain databases. Everyone knows that these kinds of projects probably won’t go far. But once you truly aim to turn it into a long-term product, this logic immediately collapses.
I found a clear dividing line—the moment the application starts consuming historical data. Blockchain games need to preserve players’ long-term progress, content platforms need to accumulate creator assets, and AI applications need to repeatedly call models and training data. Once these data become the lifeblood of the system, you can no longer treat them as external resources that can be replaced at any time. At this stage, storage issues will snowball into an uncontrollable problem.
The uncertainty I’m talking about here isn’t about security risks, but more tangible hidden dangers: Will the service suddenly go down? Will it be unilaterally interrupted? Will it be secretly altered when you have no control? Centralized solutions inherently carry this risk.