Been working through this market structure bill—270+ pages of dense regulatory language. The document raises some legitimate concerns, but what's really striking is the compressed timeline. Regulators are essentially asking stakeholders to identify potential issues and propose solutions at breakneck speed. It's a legitimately tough position: you're trying to spot regulatory land mines while the clock is ticking. The turnaround window feels almost unreasonably tight for properly vetting something this comprehensive.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
degenwhisperer
· 01-16 13:29
ngl this rushed regulatory review is ridiculous, forcing people to quickly digest 270 pages? No wonder everyone is complaining.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermit
· 01-15 19:53
Going through a 270-page document on such a tight schedule? Are the regulators trying to do a speed run... It's really like rushing a duck to the shelf.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarm
· 01-15 07:16
270-page document + compressed timeline, this combination is the rhythm that regulators want to create panic on the chain. The problem is, with this rushed pace, who can truly identify the risks in smart contracts? I bet five dollars that in the end, we'll have to rely on the community to self-rescue and find vulnerabilities.
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBad
· 01-13 18:00
ngl this rush job pace is really outrageous, giving you only a few weeks to digest 270 pages, either setting you up to fall into a trap or regulators simply not wanting to hear opinions
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 01-13 17:59
Over 270 pages of regulatory documents... The pace is really outrageous. Are they planning to point out all the issues in a month anyway? They might be testing our mind-reading skills, regulators.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityNewbie
· 01-13 17:49
A 270-page document needs to be reviewed in a week? This kind of regulation is really ridiculous, there's no time to read it properly at all.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDiver
· 01-13 17:38
Page 270, this schedule is really outrageous. Are the regulators rushing the project timeline?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 01-13 17:31
Over 270 pages of documents to digest in such a tight timeframe? The regulatory hand is really tough, huh.
Been working through this market structure bill—270+ pages of dense regulatory language. The document raises some legitimate concerns, but what's really striking is the compressed timeline. Regulators are essentially asking stakeholders to identify potential issues and propose solutions at breakneck speed. It's a legitimately tough position: you're trying to spot regulatory land mines while the clock is ticking. The turnaround window feels almost unreasonably tight for properly vetting something this comprehensive.