2026-01-13 16:39:56

Myden's leaderboard update is really attractive. The structure allows up to 300 people to receive rewards, and the rankings up to 300th place are transparently disclosed on the leaderboard. Especially, it's great that Korean users can also check separate country-specific rankings. Designing the incentive structure in this way makes people want to participate more actively. This can be seen as an example of how the project effectively encourages community participation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrying

· 01-16 12:13

A transparent ranking list of 300 spots is really well designed, much easier on the eyes compared to those fake prosperous projects. --- The "King of Circulation" development project is indeed like that; with a cap of 300 people, everyone wants to give it a shot. --- The independent ranking in Korea is quite thoughtful; localized operations are just more comfortable than global ones. --- It's that kind of "I want to participate" illusion trap, but it’s definitely easy to get hooked. --- The transparent and public ranking method is indeed effective for motivation, but it also depends on how the subsequent rewards are delivered. --- Once the national ranking list is released, local user engagement definitely increases; this tactic is quite clever. --- With rewards for up to 300 people, it sounds great... but what if the number of participants exceeds that? It still comes down to luck. --- This kind of design is honestly more transparent than projects that hide rankings; at least you know your position.

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 01-15 09:52

The transparent list of the top 300 is indeed top-notch. Only with this design can we retain people. The national ranking differentiation is a good move, finally taking care of us. Speaking of this kind of incentive mechanism, it really easily gets people hooked on climbing the ranks, and before you know it, they invest more. Rewards for all 300? This is giving retail investors a chance. Quite clever, making you feel like you have a chance to surge, and activity levels keep rising.

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 01-14 22:01

300 spots are quite friendly, not the kind of trick where only the top 10 get rewards. The tactic of ranking by country is really clever. My Korean brothers must be having even more fun. By the way, is this transparency real or is there some data manipulation?

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinTherapist

· 01-14 19:43

The 300 quota incentive pool looks pretty good, but the transparency is really well done. Thumbs up. --- The national leaderboard is pulled out separately. This move is quite clever, just to make you compete with locals. --- The entire incentive design feels like playing chess, spreading out participants' desires. --- Exactly, it's just psychological marketing, but it works effectively. --- I'm just curious, how much is the prize pool for these 300 spots worth? --- Upgraded version of the leek harvesting machine routine, now understanding how to play the community. --- The top 300 number is good. It makes most people think they have a chance, so they keep competing. --- Not to mention, it's definitely more transparent and conscientious than opaque black-box operations. --- It just feels like a routine, but I have to admit... I also want to make the leaderboard.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArchaeologist

· 01-13 17:09

Top 300 are transparent and publicly available, and there's also a national ranking? This approach is indeed brilliant. --- Gotta give a thumbs up, rewarding 300 people’s designs gives ordinary players hope too. --- The national ranking trick really has some substance; psychologically, it maximizes the desire to compete. --- Wait, could this turn into just another pay-to-win game? --- The transparency of voting rights has increased, but what do people think after the Top 300? --- This kind of ranking mechanism is a common theme; the key is whether the rewards are substantial enough.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTinfoilHat

· 01-13 17:09

I'm truly impressed by this transparency. With 300 participants openly sharing, it feels like they're asking, "Are you brave enough to compete?" The national ranking list is also a brilliant move, it really has that authentic vibe.

View OriginalReply0

GhostInTheChain

· 01-13 17:04

This transparency really has some substance; compared to those black-box rankings, it's much more comfortable. The design for the 300th place is also clever, looking substantial enough without diluting rewards, giving a sense of participation. The national track move is brilliant; the joy of local competition is truly exhilarating. By the way, if this design continues, could there be a problem of big players crushing others with capital? I'm a bit tempted to try, but I'm afraid I'll get swept away if things go south.

View OriginalReply0

PessimisticLayer

· 01-13 17:03

Huh, 300 positions are fully public? This level of transparency is indeed impressive. --- Can't keep up with the ranking anymore. So many people sharing the rewards, feels like I have to fight until the Year of the Monkey. --- This move with the national server region is somewhat interesting. Finally considering the feelings of Korean users. --- By the way, does this ranking incentive really work, or is it just psychological comfort? --- They stubbornly designed the top 300, the algorithm engineers are quite clever. --- It seems like they want everyone to have a chance, but in reality, it just disperses anxiety. --- Transparent rankings are easy to get hooked on. I've already looked at today's rankings three times.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 01-13 16:47

The limit of 300 people looks transparent, but I think it's playing with psychology. Once the competition vibe kicks in, people just can't stop. By the way, the national leaderboard trick is really clever. It completely stimulates Koreans' competitive desire. This kind of design is basically courting your FOMO. I get it, really get it. Wait, only 300 people can receive rewards? Then the others are just filling the bottom of the fish pond. But I have to admit, transparent leaderboards are indeed more appealing than black-box operations. At least you don't have to suspect whether you're being secretly exploited.

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 01-13 16:43

The transparent ranking of 300 spots is really impressive. With this design, anyone has a chance to get on the list. The national ranking trick is brilliant, instantly bringing the Korean community into the fold. We should learn from it. But to be honest, do people beyond the 300th spot lose motivation... This ranking game is so addictive, no wonder participation rates are skyrocketing. It feels like they've quantified competition, truly a genius design for driving motivation. The transparency is undeniable; at least it doesn't feel like a black box operation. Honestly, when I see someone surpass my rank... hey, I just want to grind harder.

View OriginalReply0