Recently emerging Meme coins have attracted attention in the secondary market amidst controversy. This phenomenon is actually not unfamiliar—looking back at the history of the crypto market, popular tokens like SHIB, PEPE, and TRUMP have all experienced similar polarized opinions, and in fact, controversy has often fueled their popularity.
From a market structure perspective, leading Meme coins usually give rise to multiple similar competitors. Just like the relationship between DOGE and SHIB, ORDI and SAT, UNI and SUSHI, when a certain concept becomes popular, multi-chain deployment and a dual-track system of spot contracts have almost become standard. The current hot coin has similar conditions; as long as no other token with greater traffic surpasses it in the short term, its pullback presents a low-risk buying opportunity.
In terms of investment strategy, it is more prudent to adopt a phased approach and control individual trade risks. Based on historical experience, Meme coin surges often occur within one or two days, and the probability of catching the rhythm is much higher than going all-in at once.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchroedingerMiner
· 01-15 20:37
Controversy is traffic, and traffic is money. This logic has been played out long ago.
Meme coins surge and crash daily; always going all-in results in losses. Gradual investment is the way to go.
SHIB was also criticized like this in the beginning. Buying the dip during a pullback is much more satisfying than chasing highs.
These multi-chain deployment tricks are all seen through now. The key is still to control risk.
Achieving a rapid surge in one or two days? I can't catch this wave anymore.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 01-15 16:16
Controversy actually boosts popularity; this tactic is all too familiar.
How are those who went all-in doing... Staggered entries are the real strategy.
SHIB was also criticized like this back then, and now?
Buying the dip and waiting for a pullback is much more valuable than going all-in.
Another one aiming to double? First, let's see if there's a larger volume coin dumping.
View OriginalReply0
TooScaredToSell
· 01-14 16:25
The bigger the controversy, the higher the heat. This routine has been played out long ago.
Is it all-in again or staggered? Depends on luck.
DOGE to SHIB and now this bunch, it all feels like copy and paste.
Is there a chance to buy low? Or just an excuse for deep traps haha.
A sudden surge in one or two days, a loss over one or two years—this is the nature of meme coins.
Talking about catching the rhythm is easy, but few can really time it right.
Multi-chain deployment sounds like the prelude to cutting leeks.
Staggered deployment sounds rational, but in reality, it’s still just gambling with luck.
History will repeat itself, and our wallets will also bleed again.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-13 16:49
Controversy = Traffic = Rise. This set of logic is the truth in meme coins.
Entering in batches is truly the only way to survive and leave.
What happened to the guys who went all-in... I dare not ask.
There are indeed opportunities for low buying; it all depends on whether you're willing to wait for that moment.
The story of SHIB from back then is now repeating itself; history is always so similar and ironic.
View OriginalReply0
RetroHodler91
· 01-13 16:42
Controversy is traffic, otherwise how to stand out.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 01-13 16:35
nah fr the dip is where the real money moves... mempool's already cooking something spicy on this one
Reply0
BearMarketNoodler
· 01-13 16:35
Controversy is the best marketing; how many rounds has this trick been played?
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidator
· 01-13 16:29
Looking at the history of SHIB and PEPE, controversy is actually the best marketing strategy.
It's really about waiting for a pullback, and buying in batches is the way to go.
For Meme coins, it all depends on who can ride the wave the longest.
A rapid surge within one or two days; if you miss it, just wait for the next concept.
Multi-chain deployment is now standard; with so many competitors, there's no difference.
Only going all-in is truly clear-headed; controlling risk is the most important.
How long can this wave of popularity last? It feels like the trend shifts very quickly.
The group is talking about new coins again; it seems less hot than PEPE's hype.
Instead of chasing highs, it's better to wait for the bottom; anyway, there are plenty of opportunities.
The more controversy, the higher the popularity; I've seen through this routine a long time ago.
Recently emerging Meme coins have attracted attention in the secondary market amidst controversy. This phenomenon is actually not unfamiliar—looking back at the history of the crypto market, popular tokens like SHIB, PEPE, and TRUMP have all experienced similar polarized opinions, and in fact, controversy has often fueled their popularity.
From a market structure perspective, leading Meme coins usually give rise to multiple similar competitors. Just like the relationship between DOGE and SHIB, ORDI and SAT, UNI and SUSHI, when a certain concept becomes popular, multi-chain deployment and a dual-track system of spot contracts have almost become standard. The current hot coin has similar conditions; as long as no other token with greater traffic surpasses it in the short term, its pullback presents a low-risk buying opportunity.
In terms of investment strategy, it is more prudent to adopt a phased approach and control individual trade risks. Based on historical experience, Meme coin surges often occur within one or two days, and the probability of catching the rhythm is much higher than going all-in at once.