While enforcement challenges persist in the current system, there's a compelling case for stricter regulations. Congressional members, along with their immediate families and extended networks, should face comprehensive trading restrictions on equities. The rationale is straightforward: elected officials and their close associates holding direct market positions creates inherent conflicts of interest that undermine fair market mechanics and public trust. This structural safeguard isn't just about ethics—it's fundamental to preventing information asymmetry abuse and maintaining market integrity.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeBarbecue
· 2h ago
Haha, I've been talking about this for so many years, but it still doesn't help.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPhantom
· 01-15 04:03
Basically, it's time to regulate politicians from scamming retail investors. The ban on insider trading should have come long ago.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 01-14 15:04
Basically, officials shouldn't trade stocks. There's really no room for discussion on this matter.
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPull
· 01-13 08:04
Oh wow, lawmakers should have been banned from stock trading long ago, otherwise how can fair competition happen?
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicorn
· 01-13 08:00
Honestly, politicians' stock accounts are like unsettled positions that will eventually be liquidated... Information asymmetry is the biggest leverage, and this logic has long been validated on the blockchain.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarm
· 01-13 07:57
Why do I feel like this is just the same old trick of politicians harvesting retail investors, no different from our crypto project teams dumping tokens... It's all about information asymmetry, with the advantage players taking advantage of ordinary people. On-chain data can still be traced, so we have a chance, but those folks in Congress are just fine—insider trading openly and nobody cares? Is this what you call market integrity? Laughable. First, investigate the fund flows of those large wallet addresses; they must all be insider traders.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollector
· 01-13 07:57
Basically, it's just that politicians are being too ruthless in harvesting the little guys. Someone needs to put a stop to it.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 01-13 07:50
ngl this insider trading thing is basically the same vector we see in defi rugpulls... pattern analysis suggests elected officials are just doing what devs do when they have asymmetric info advantage. flagged activity incoming fr
While enforcement challenges persist in the current system, there's a compelling case for stricter regulations. Congressional members, along with their immediate families and extended networks, should face comprehensive trading restrictions on equities. The rationale is straightforward: elected officials and their close associates holding direct market positions creates inherent conflicts of interest that undermine fair market mechanics and public trust. This structural safeguard isn't just about ethics—it's fundamental to preventing information asymmetry abuse and maintaining market integrity.