2026-01-10 09:27:49

Whether a project can go far is never judged by the contributions of one or two individuals. Recently, I’ve noticed that some project team members' family members are also starting to get involved, and with the official side continuously making efforts, it becomes clear when compared to past successful cases—that the market capitalization's potential is actually limited. This is not pessimism but a reasonable judgment based on the current market landscape and team composition. For a project to break through the valuation constraints of similar types, it relies on the collective effort of the entire ecosystem, rather than hoping for a star figure.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-74b10196

· 01-13 05:14

The family member entry thing is indeed interesting; it seems like it's going to cool down.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 01-13 01:55

Family members entering the scene is indeed quite interesting. What does it imply? --- The term "ceiling" is used brilliantly; it's been obvious for a long time. --- Eco-cooperation? Ha, the key is having someone actually doing the work. --- You can't just be bearish and appear objective; what about the data? --- Having seen too many projects, a reliable team is more valuable than anything. --- The limited imagination for market cap is true, but it also depends on who's in charge. --- Family involvement... this tactic is becoming more and more routine. --- Eco-system cooperation sounds good, but in reality, it's all about funding and publicity. --- Breaking free from valuation constraints isn't that easy; it requires genuine demand to support it.

View OriginalReply0

MemeCurator

· 01-10 09:53

Family members involved? Then be careful, these signals really need to be analyzed carefully.

View OriginalReply0

MergeConflict

· 01-10 09:50

Relying on the entire ecosystem? Nice words, but in reality, it still depends on whether a certain leader is willing to buy in.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller69

· 01-10 09:49

Haha, it's the same old story again. Listening to ecosystem collaboration until ears are calloused. --- Honestly, family involvement can easily lead to failures. --- The ceiling theory is back. Every time it's said, the price still goes up. --- Exactly, the team is the core. Celebrity worship is deadly. --- Wait, does family involvement really affect valuation? --- This view is too moderate. In successful cases, it's still a few people holding everything up. --- Ecosystem collaboration? Sounds impressive but it's really just each doing their own thing. --- Oh, don't be so pessimistic. The project is still in its early stages. --- Indeed, I've seen many projects fail just because a founder leaves. --- But on the other hand, the idea that market cap has a ceiling is a bit absolute. --- Family involvement... this signal feels a bit off. --- Instead of focusing on ecosystem development, it's better to improve the fundamentals first.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 01-10 09:37

This move of family members getting involved... indeed has a hint of family-style governance, which is a sign of the mechanism design collapsing.

View OriginalReply0