From a booming presence to a near-deserted scene, how dramatic can this project's story get?
Recently, a big holder has become a bit restless. Starting to accumulate near the peak in early October, increasing their holdings all the way into mid-November. During that time, when market enthusiasm was at its highest, the market cap once surged to $522 million. And what happened next? It steadily declined to $102 million, a drop of nearly 80%.
Yesterday, this individual recharged 18 million tokens into the exchange, worth about $2.5 million, with an average cost of $0.1386. This action of recharging speaks volumes—holding a massive amount of chips, market confidence had long been lost. From confidently building positions to now urgently selling, isn't this a personal holding game?
With the market cap halved again and again, someone profits while others lose. Was this whale's big move a bottom-fishing effort or a real withdrawal? There’s no absolute answer in the market, but the act of recharging already says everything.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
metaverse_hermit
· 01-08 06:57
Another good show, the high-level bagholders are now panicking
This guy bet wrong, dropping from 522 million to just over 100 million, I can see through his pants
Recharging is admitting defeat, it's time to run away
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-08 06:56
80% decline... This data structure is just outrageous, dropping straight from 522 million to 102 million, a typical reverse template of capital efficiency. 18 million coins dumped on the exchange, with an average cost of only $0.1386. It looks like this guy's hedging strategy has already collapsed in this wave of operations.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_wallet
· 01-08 06:56
A typical high-level bagholder, now eager to offload chips.
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplant
· 01-08 06:54
Haha, it's the same old trick of big whales running away... 5.22 billion dropped to 102 million. This is really a killer signal, a clear sign of deposit and withdrawal manipulation.
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971
· 01-08 06:53
Bro, this time I really got cut. An 80% drop directly handed over to the exchange. I knew there was no hope.
View OriginalReply0
DoomCanister
· 01-08 06:34
This whale is really panicking, dropping from 500 million to 100 million, an 80% decline—who can withstand that?
Recharging is a signal of surrender; stop talking about bottom-fishing or not.
Those who bought at the high in October are probably all trapped now...
This time is indeed a bit surreal; with the market cap falling like this, who still dares to enter?
Should have run away long ago; now that it's dragged on, only option is to cut losses.
From a booming presence to a near-deserted scene, how dramatic can this project's story get?
Recently, a big holder has become a bit restless. Starting to accumulate near the peak in early October, increasing their holdings all the way into mid-November. During that time, when market enthusiasm was at its highest, the market cap once surged to $522 million. And what happened next? It steadily declined to $102 million, a drop of nearly 80%.
Yesterday, this individual recharged 18 million tokens into the exchange, worth about $2.5 million, with an average cost of $0.1386. This action of recharging speaks volumes—holding a massive amount of chips, market confidence had long been lost. From confidently building positions to now urgently selling, isn't this a personal holding game?
With the market cap halved again and again, someone profits while others lose. Was this whale's big move a bottom-fishing effort or a real withdrawal? There’s no absolute answer in the market, but the act of recharging already says everything.