What Really Moves Token Prices?

Beyond the obviou

Question

LiquidationWatcher · Accepted Answer

Ultimately, it still comes down to on-chain data. Focusing only on candlestick charts is suicidal.

Institutional money injection is the most powerful thing; no matter how retail investors shout, they can't withstand large capital.

I think the hype around protocol upgrades has been exaggerated; there are only a few that are truly useful.

Support and resistance levels... Hey, sometimes it's just a self-fulfilling prophecy.

When the macro environment changes, all fundamentals become irrelevant.

NFTRegretter · Answer

Nonsense, in the end, it still depends on who has the money to dump the market.

Multiple times the on-chain activity won't make a difference; a single whale selling can wipe it out.

All those fundamentals? It's better to just watch whale wallets for more practical insights.

Technical analysis? Support and resistance? All armchair quarterbacking; what truly matters are liquidity and institutional willingness.

Coins that institutions aren't interested in are just worthless even with excellent code.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ · Answer

Honestly, on-chain activity and institutional movements are more accurate than anything else. Retail investors look at narratives, I look at wallet flows. It's clear who is making money and who is deceiving.

BuyTheTop · Answer

Basically, it still comes down to on-chain data. Those who only look at candlestick charts to tell stories will have to kneel.

We were still cutting losses when institutions were bottom-fishing.

Protocol upgrades are often overrated; real profits come from discovering undervalued fundamentals.

A shift in macroeconomics can topple even the strongest narratives. This time, I truly understand.

Coins with shallow market depth can be easily dumped by one or two big players. It's better to choose those with good liquidity.

DegenMcsleepless · Answer

Really? Most people are still looking at candlestick charts, but the fundamentals have been there all along.

On-chain activity is the most honest; money doesn't lie.

When institutions start to enter, you know it's about to take off. Retail investors are still trying to catch the bottom.

To put it simply, it's all about trading depth. No matter how good a story a coin has, if liquidity is poor, it's useless.

When macro conditions change, all fundamentals have to give way. That's the reality.

Protocol updates are easy to overlook, but they can truly change the game rules.

Narratives can create trends, but they don't last long, brother.

Support and resistance levels are honestly just psychological games, but they are useful.

I really need to brush up on my tokenomics.

NewPumpamentals · Answer

That's right, but I think 99% of people still only pay attention to narrative hype...

On-chain data is the truth, but unfortunately most retail investors are too lazy to look.

Institutional bottom-fishing actions are much more honest than what they say.

When macro changes, all fundamentals become irrelevant, this is the most painful part.

Support and resistance levels are important, but more importantly, who is there to pick up the bag?

Token economic design truly determines life and death, but few people study it seriously.

Narrative is the seasoning, liquidity is the main course; get it wrong, and you die.

FlashLoanLarry · Answer

Honestly, on-chain activity can't be fooled; this is real gold and silver.

You can feel it when institutions enter, but most people are still looking at charts haha.

Fundamentals are always drowned out in nonsense, this is the current situation.

When macro turns around and hits hard, all technical analysis becomes useless.

Coins that can't sustain trading volume are a no-go, this is my ironclad rule.

What Really Moves Token Prices?

Trending Topics

GateFun马勒戈币Surges1251.09%

GateSquareCreatorNewYearIncentives

NonfarmPayrollsComing

DailyMarketOverview

IstheMarketBottoming?

Hot Gate Fun

死了么

死了么

Sileme

死了么

包子

包子

马上發

马上發

收益曲线

收益曲线

Pin