2026-01-07 06:23:20

Recently, I've noticed significant fluctuations in the rankings of projects within the crypto ecosystem, with many projects' popularity rankings being readjusted. New changes occur almost every month, which has become quite normal. Among them, the performance of TruthTensor's proxy is worth paying attention to, as users can perform over 800,000 fine-tuning operations, which is quite imaginative in the AI application field. It is indeed considered a transformative direction in the AI industry—this kind of large-scale customization capability opens up new possibilities for users who want to deeply participate in the AI ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MechanicalMartel

· 01-07 06:51

800,000 fine-tuning sessions? It sounds pretty exaggerated, but how many can actually be used?

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-07 06:50

800,000 fine-tuning sessions? Sounds pretty outrageous, is it real or not? --- TruthTensor is revolutionizing again and again, with new tricks every month. I'm a bit tired of it, haha. --- Large-scale customization sounds good, but I don't know if it can actually be used in practice. --- The ranking fluctuations are so frequent that I've become numb. There will be new faces next month. --- 800,000 operations... how much money do you need to afford this thing? --- The ability to customize is indeed attractive, but can the ecosystem really support it? That's a question mark.

View OriginalReply0

SnapshotLaborer

· 01-07 06:48

800,000 fine-tuning sessions sound impressive, but do people really need that? --- TruthTensor's move is quite impressive; its customization capabilities really hit the pain points of the AI ecosystem. --- Another month, another round of reshuffling. This pace is indeed a bit fast. --- Over 800,000 times? Honestly, that's a bit outrageous. Where did this number come from? --- Deep involvement in the AI ecosystem... How are the costs calculated? That's the real key. --- Rank fluctuations have become the norm; just see who can survive the next round. --- As for customization, it sounds much more useful than it actually is. --- Allowing users to have such large-scale operation permissions—what about the risks?

View OriginalReply0

BakedCatFanboy

· 01-07 06:28

800,000 fine-tuning runs? That number sounds a bit unbelievable. Can it really be achieved?

View OriginalReply0