I've seen many influencers share how to reproduce trading strategies solely based on on-chain addresses and code structure. But there's a logical flaw here—without order placement and cancellation records, the key decision points of the strategy cannot be reconstructed. The dynamic changes in the order book, subtle timing adjustments, specific risk control parameters... these are often the core of arbitrage or hedging strategies. Only superficial traces exist, but the actual logical chain is broken. This isn't to say you can't learn, but you must acknowledge the limitations of on-chain data—some things are inherently black boxes.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FloorPriceNightmare
· 17h ago
To be honest, these influencers' claims are indeed exaggerated. Without order book dynamics, it's impossible to reproduce the results.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-07 23:48
Bro is right, on-chain data is just a facade; the real money is made off-chain.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArtisanHQ
· 01-05 18:11
honestly the orderbook gap is where the whole "reverse engineer everything on-chain" narrative falls apart... mempool dynamics, that split-second timing thing—it's like trying to reconstruct a composition by just looking at the canvas, missing the actual brushstrokes that made it happen. the real alpha was always in what *isn't* recorded.
Reply0
TokenDustCollector
· 01-05 18:09
On-chain data is just that annoying; I can see the moves but not the intention.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagrant
· 01-05 18:09
Exactly right, on-chain data is like watching a movie with only the subtitles; the core plot is all in the dialogue.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiary
· 01-05 18:08
On-chain data is like having a CT scan but no medical records; surface phenomena can't hide the truth, but key nodes are all blank. The big influencers speak beautifully, but when it comes to actual operations, the truth is exposed.
View OriginalReply0
fork_in_the_road
· 01-05 18:05
On-chain data is like a dice roll; you can see the transaction results but not the details of the game. This aspect has indeed been overlooked too much.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69
· 01-05 17:57
It's outrageous. Those reproduction tutorials really misled people, making them think they could understand others' logic just by looking at on-chain data. There's truly no way to crack the black box.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 01-05 17:57
On-chain trace discontinuity, this is the real truth... The matter that big V's all avoid talking about
I've seen many influencers share how to reproduce trading strategies solely based on on-chain addresses and code structure. But there's a logical flaw here—without order placement and cancellation records, the key decision points of the strategy cannot be reconstructed. The dynamic changes in the order book, subtle timing adjustments, specific risk control parameters... these are often the core of arbitrage or hedging strategies. Only superficial traces exist, but the actual logical chain is broken. This isn't to say you can't learn, but you must acknowledge the limitations of on-chain data—some things are inherently black boxes.