There's something compelling about the vision here that's hard to argue against. Either humanity stays tethered to one world—which feels like a pretty limiting bet—or we genuinely pursue becoming a spacefaring, multi-planetary civilization. The choice seems pretty binary when you frame it that way.
From an investment thesis standpoint, the upside optionality is hard to ignore. You're not just backing a company; you're essentially positioning yourself behind humanity's next chapter. Whether that plays out as anticipated is another matter, but the structural case for exposure feels solid.
This could rewrite what "generational wealth creation" actually means.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
governance_lurker
· 01-06 10:11
ngl, this logic is a bit too clean... Do we really have to choose one or the other? The actual gamble might be much more complicated than this.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentSage
· 01-05 19:19
Sounds good, but can betting on humanity's future really make money?
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviser
· 01-03 11:51
ngl, this logic is a bit too convenient... Is it really that simple to be either/or?
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObserver
· 01-03 11:36
In plain terms, betting on the story of humanity's future is always more exciting than betting on a company... but the key is that this story has to be credible.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Bandit
· 01-03 11:33
ngl the binary framing here's kinda missing the nuance... we've seen this "all or nothing" narrative cycle through crypto too many times. remember 2017? everyone was positioning for "the future" then lmao
Reply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 01-03 11:30
Basically, it's all in for the future. Either get stuck on Earth waiting to die, or bet on humanity's next step... The risks are high, but just thinking about the upside gets me excited.
View OriginalReply0
GameFiCritic
· 01-03 11:23
Hmm... It seems grand, but it's actually a bet that humanity won't self-destruct. This bet is a bit thrilling.
There's something compelling about the vision here that's hard to argue against. Either humanity stays tethered to one world—which feels like a pretty limiting bet—or we genuinely pursue becoming a spacefaring, multi-planetary civilization. The choice seems pretty binary when you frame it that way.
From an investment thesis standpoint, the upside optionality is hard to ignore. You're not just backing a company; you're essentially positioning yourself behind humanity's next chapter. Whether that plays out as anticipated is another matter, but the structural case for exposure feels solid.
This could rewrite what "generational wealth creation" actually means.