We're seeing repeated sell pressure on every rally—time to flip the script and do this the right way as a community. What's the real move here? One solid option: push to have that reward wallet transferred over to the community treasury. But that's just the beginning. What comes next in the roadmap? How do we structure incentives so they actually align with long-term holders instead of just fueling quick dumps? Let's think this through together.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotAFinancialAdvice
· 01-06 05:55
Repeatedly selling off? To put it simply, no one truly believes in it. They say they hold long-term, but their fingers are already on the sell button.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Bandit
· 01-05 20:44
been mining this space since the early days, and ngl... moving rewards to community treasuries? seen it work, seen it fail hard. depends entirely on the difficulty adjustment you're building into those incentives tbh. if you're just shuffling coins around without proper hashrate backing the consensus, it's just cosmetics fr
Reply0
RetroHodler91
· 01-04 18:42
Here we go again with this? Every time there's a rebound, you dump the market. It's really getting on my nerves🤦
View OriginalReply0
SocialFiQueen
· 01-03 10:53
Repeated selling pressure is indeed annoying, but just transferring rewards to the community treasury can solve it? That's too simplistic. The key is still to design a good incentive mechanism.
View OriginalReply0
NFTregretter
· 01-03 10:53
Here we go again with this? Every time there's a rebound, they dump the market. It's really getting annoying.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinGuardian
· 01-03 10:52
Repeated selling is really getting annoying. How can the project survive if this continues? The community treasury's move needs to be made, but it must be accompanied by proper incentives.
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedian
· 01-03 10:51
Once again, it's the same old story of repeated selling... No matter how nicely it's said, it's just empty talk. Will it really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
OnChainSleuth
· 01-03 10:33
It's the same old story of repeated sell-offs... Honestly, it's just that the incentive mechanism wasn't designed properly.
View OriginalReply0
BottomMisser
· 01-03 10:32
Damn it, both rebound and dump, so annoying. Does the community treasury system really work? I'm a bit skeptical.
---
To put it simply, how to design the incentive mechanism so that it doesn't become a tool for cutting leeks—that's the key.
---
Always shouting slogans like this, but in the end, isn't it the same outcome.
---
Long-term holders? Uh... who still dares to hold long-term now, haha.
---
The community treasury sounds good, but only real money on the ground counts.
---
If this wave really turns around, I'll eat my keyboard live, honestly.
---
The incentive mechanism really needs to be carefully thought out, or else it'll just be empty talk.
We're seeing repeated sell pressure on every rally—time to flip the script and do this the right way as a community. What's the real move here? One solid option: push to have that reward wallet transferred over to the community treasury. But that's just the beginning. What comes next in the roadmap? How do we structure incentives so they actually align with long-term holders instead of just fueling quick dumps? Let's think this through together.