2026-01-03 09:23:05

Sure, sure... you claim you've boosted those payouts? The reality tells a different story. The numbers just don't add up when you look at what traders are actually receiving versus what's being advertised. It's a classic move—flashy announcements that don't translate into meaningful improvements for users.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FOMOmonster

· 01-05 03:17

Another story of pie in the sky to fill the stomach. I've seen too many. Numbers never lie, but announcements are always full of nonsense.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 01-04 23:22

lol the correlation matrix between their claims and actual payouts is basically negative at this point. seen this liquidity crisis playbook a hundred times before... smart money already dipped.

Reply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 01-04 03:45

It's the same old story, a bunch of flowery words, all the numbers are fake. You'll only realize you've been scammed once the money is in your hands.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightSeller

· 01-03 09:52

It's the same old story, claiming to increase dividends, but the data leaks as soon as it's compared. I wonder who really believes it.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-03 09:51

Coming back with this again? If the numbers don't match, they just don't match. No matter how loud you boast, it's useless.

View OriginalReply0

memecoin_therapy

· 01-03 09:50

Coming back with this again? The numbers don't add up. I just want to know how the actual returns are calculated.

View OriginalReply0

TokenAlchemist

· 01-03 09:49

ngl the payout delta between their marketing metrics and actual execution is basically just obfuscated MEV extraction at this point... classic protocol theater tbh

Reply0

BridgeJumper

· 01-03 09:48

Revealing the trick as soon as you compare the numbers—this tactic is way too old.

View OriginalReply0