Looking at ETH's recent market performance, it's simply a battleground between the bulls and bears. I reviewed the latest on-chain smart money data and was directly stunned—there are actually 747 bearish whales, more than four times the number of bullish ones! Even more astonishing, the price has risen to $3,128, and these bearish positions are already showing unrealized losses of over $120 million, yet not a single one has closed their position. They've effectively turned this loss into a "high-cost chip wall" pressing down on the market.
Let's first clarify what "smart money data" means—basically, it refers to the holdings of large institutions and major players with significant capital. The actions of these players often reflect the true market sentiment more reliably than those who talk a lot but do little. The core contradiction in this set of data is very clear: the price is rising, yet the bears stubbornly refuse to admit defeat.
According to conventional thinking, with the price breaking down and unrealized losses so large, the bears should have cut losses and exited long ago. But they refuse to do so. This isn't reckless stubbornness; there's logic behind it. First, players big enough to be called whales typically have capital in the tens of billions or more. An unrealized loss of $120 million might be just a drop in the bucket for them. This means they have enough "ammunition" to hold their positions and are not at risk of a liquidity crisis. Second, holders of this level usually are not short-term traders; their strategic horizon is measured in months or even quarters, so short-term price fluctuations have little impact on their decisions. More importantly, this "willingness to hold despite unrealized losses" itself sends a signal to the market—that they are confident in the subsequent trend.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
11
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiChallenger
· 01-06 07:51
The data shows? I’d rather see how many of these 747 shorts are left after half a year. Historical lessons tell me that holding on to unrealized losses is usually the prelude to a final act.
Ironically, having ammunition doesn’t mean the decision is correct. The last institution so confident like this is now also facing a high liquidation rate.
Interesting, packaging "no stop-loss" as "confidence"—that narrative is top-notch.
Objectively speaking, a 120 million unrealized loss holding firm—does that mean the market is bearish afterward? I feel like it’s more like being too deep in a trap to get out.
Not to be confrontational, but anyone who experienced the 2018 wave knows that whale’s "dead hold" is sometimes just a last struggle before being overwhelmed.
So the core question is: are these shorts smart or trapped with no choice? I bet on the latter.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 01-06 07:17
747 short whales are holding on tight and not running away, are they trying to drag the market down alive?
---
Floating loss of 120 million yuan and not cutting losses? Either they have lost their minds or they really have confidence.
---
The short positions are indeed intimidating, but I feel like this is just their final desperate struggle.
---
Hardly taking on a floating loss of 120 million yuan, this guy's mental resilience is truly outrageous.
---
According to this logic, if the shorts don't admit defeat, it's actually a good sign? Then I should reverse my position.
---
This data looks like the shorts are playing a big game, but it could also just be a case of losing a bet and stubbornly refusing to admit it.
---
Chips wall and similar things sound good in theory, but the key is how long they can hold up afterward.
---
747 vs less than 200? That ratio is indeed a bit hopeless, no wonder so many people are bearish.
---
1.2 billion yuan is a drop in the bucket for whales, but for us, it's an astronomical number. Different positions mean different shows to watch.
---
So many shorts still holding on tight, either there's a big plan behind it or they're just taking the fire for the bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 01-06 03:37
747 short whales stubbornly resist a floating loss of 120 million, how much confidence does that take? It feels like a big show is coming up.
View OriginalReply0
RooftopReserver
· 01-03 09:50
747 shorts stubbornly holding on to 120 million in unrealized losses—do these guys really know what they're doing, or are they just throwing a tantrum?
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy
· 01-03 09:50
The bears are so confident; they're definitely playing a big game.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunner
· 01-03 09:44
747 short whales hold on to 120 million in unrealized losses, paving the way for a subsequent plunge...
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-03 09:37
747 short whales stubbornly resist a floating loss of 120 million, these guys are really holding back a big move.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 01-03 09:32
747 short whales fiercely resist 120 million in unrealized losses? These guys are really betting it all.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 01-03 09:30
747 short whales stubbornly holding onto 120 million in unrealized losses—how bearish do you have to be? I'm really starting to lose it.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 01-03 09:21
747 short whales stubbornly holding on to 120 million in unrealized losses, what is this trying to tell us?
Looking at ETH's recent market performance, it's simply a battleground between the bulls and bears. I reviewed the latest on-chain smart money data and was directly stunned—there are actually 747 bearish whales, more than four times the number of bullish ones! Even more astonishing, the price has risen to $3,128, and these bearish positions are already showing unrealized losses of over $120 million, yet not a single one has closed their position. They've effectively turned this loss into a "high-cost chip wall" pressing down on the market.
Let's first clarify what "smart money data" means—basically, it refers to the holdings of large institutions and major players with significant capital. The actions of these players often reflect the true market sentiment more reliably than those who talk a lot but do little. The core contradiction in this set of data is very clear: the price is rising, yet the bears stubbornly refuse to admit defeat.
According to conventional thinking, with the price breaking down and unrealized losses so large, the bears should have cut losses and exited long ago. But they refuse to do so. This isn't reckless stubbornness; there's logic behind it. First, players big enough to be called whales typically have capital in the tens of billions or more. An unrealized loss of $120 million might be just a drop in the bucket for them. This means they have enough "ammunition" to hold their positions and are not at risk of a liquidity crisis. Second, holders of this level usually are not short-term traders; their strategic horizon is measured in months or even quarters, so short-term price fluctuations have little impact on their decisions. More importantly, this "willingness to hold despite unrealized losses" itself sends a signal to the market—that they are confident in the subsequent trend.