Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
#数字资产动态追踪 Giant Mammoth Chain announced an ambitious upgrade plan at UTC 03:00. The project released this announcement on its third anniversary, with the core highlight being the new GMMT Vault staking system.
How did they design it? The APY is directly linked to the market price—expressed as: basic yield = market price × 1000, plus layered reward modules. Sounds good: when the token price rises, your earnings increase accordingly, allowing long-term holders to earn more. In theory, it can lock in a wave of funds.
But there's a problem. You need to look at the project's transparency itself. Data visibility is limited, social media discussions are mainly on Twitter, and it lacks endorsement from mainstream data platforms. Overall, it feels like an early pre-TGE project with insufficient information disclosure.
Where are the key risks? In a price-linked staking model, the token price and APY are positively correlated—this is a double-edged sword. If the token price drops, the APY will also fall, and holders seeing their yields shrink may redeem en masse, which further depresses the price. This creates a negative feedback loop, potentially leading to a death spiral.
There's also a deeper issue: where does the high APY come from? If it's mainly supported by token issuance without real protocol revenue backing it, early holders will ultimately be hurt—their value will be diluted.
For major upgrade announcements of such small to medium projects, it's best to stay calm. Wait for third-party verification data and observe the actual performance over a few months before making judgments. The crypto space isn't short on flashy whitepapers and promises; only projects that can survive and continuously deliver are the true winners.
Let me see if this Giant Mammoth Chain is transparent first...
The price spiral is really terrifying; early investors are bound to get cut.
Where does high APY come from? It's just printing money; without real protocol revenue support, it's all虚假.
I treat upgrade announcements of these small and medium projects as stories; let's wait a few months for data before judging.
No matter how beautiful the white paper is, it’s useless; the crypto world is full of stories of scammers.
When the coin price drops, the APY drops as well, and many people will run away at that time.
With such opaque data, claiming a three-year anniversary upgrade is just a joke.
High APY is nothing but crazy issuance; early investors are just waiting to be diluted.
Still watching and waiting, let's see how things go after a few months of actual operation.
When the coin price crashes, you'll understand what a negative feedback loop really means.
Pre-TGE still dares to boast about three years, laugh out loud.
High APY is essentially just air; no income means dilution of retail investors.
I advise everyone to stay calm and not be brainwashed by the white paper.
This round will once again see a batch of early bagholders get wiped out.
---
Death spiral warning: when the token drops, APY also drops, and holders just run away.
---
What about transparency? Twitter small circle hype doesn't mean much.
---
High APY = high issuance, and ultimately retail investors are the ones taking the risk. It's old news.
---
Let's wait for the data before making any judgments. Don't be fooled by whitepapers.
---
Pre-TGE projects still dare to boast about upgrades; prove you can survive first before talking.
---
The crypto cycle repeats every three years. I've seen this kind of design too many times, and none have a good ending.
---
The question is, who will bear the risk? The protocol has no income, so it's ultimately a Ponzi scheme.
---
Remaining calm and observant is the way to go. Those rushing in early will regret it sooner or later.
Wait, with such low transparency, you still dare to boast? I don't believe it.