2026-01-03 08:21:04

Many people complain to me that they keep getting liquidated when trading contracts. I've heard many stories, but honestly, the problem is often not the market itself, but that they simply don't understand how to get started.

I focus on two cryptocurrencies—Bitcoin and Ethereum. Starting with 100,000 in capital, I use a consistent trading approach and have maintained a steady monthly growth of 30% to 50%, never experiencing a liquidation. It's not luck; it's because I have the right method.

**My logic is very simple: I don't aim for leverage, only stability, accuracy, and decisiveness.**

When shorting? I only look at the 4-hour chart. I wait until the price rebounds to the MA60 or other moving averages acting as resistance before entering in batches. This isn't guesswork; it's confirming the rebound before taking action.

When do I go long? When support levels of the same or even higher levels show a spike, I build positions gradually. The benefit of this approach is that risk is controllable.

For stop-loss, I have strict rules: no more than 15% of the principal lost per day, and no single loss exceeding 10%. Once triggered, I immediately take a break—never emotionally add to a position or hold on stubbornly.

For position management, I use a fixed position size. Each entry is the same size—no adding, no reducing, and no full allocation at once. It may seem conservative, but it helps me survive longer. I avoid overnight positions and don't chase quick profits, because those often bite back.

When the market is unclear? I choose to stay out of the market. Better to miss an opportunity than to make a reckless trade. During a dump, I wait patiently, ready to catch the needle, and if there's no opportunity, I wait—don't go actively giving away money.

When can I be more aggressive? When the overall trend shows a clear direction. Follow the main trend—go all in on shorts or longs. Chase hot spots when necessary, without hesitation.

The beauty of this approach is that—it's suitable for large capital operations with discipline, and also for small funds using leverage to amplify gains. The core logic remains the same; only the position size and risk level are adjusted according to the capital.

All in all, there's only one main theme: if you want to make steady money, learning to control risk is a thousand times more important than chasing huge profits.

BTC0,4%

ETH0,45%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DuskSurfer

· 01-05 23:08

This discipline is really tough. Achieving a 30-50% monthly increase without liquidation shows there's definitely something to it. Losing 15% daily and then taking a break—many people can't do that. The 4-hour chart combined with MA60 sounds simple, but actually executing it is the hard part. The fixed position size method is interesting; it avoids human greed. Having patience to stay out of the market and wait for opportunities is something retail investors find hard to learn. When the market is uncertain, lying flat—many people get liquidated because they can't sit still. This logic essentially means that surviving longer is more important than making quick money. The prerequisite is genuine discipline and execution ability. To put it simply, risk control comes first; don't expect huge profits.

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 01-03 18:43

Honestly, this set of theories sounds good, but very few people can actually execute them properly. A daily loss limit of 15%? I think many people simply can't control themselves. A monthly increase of 30-50%? That seems a bit exaggerated... or is it just performance selected for showcase? I agree with fixed position sizing, but adopting a wait-and-see attitude with an empty position is really hard for retail investors to do. I’d like to ask about some details of the 4-hour MA60 trading strategy. Talking on paper is easy; real money is the true test. No matter what they say, people who get liquidated just won't listen—that's probably fate. I think the core is still discipline in stop-loss; everything else is secondary. Are you selling courses on this stuff? Haha

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 01-03 08:51

Another trading genius earning 30-50% per month, interesting [cold smile] What do the stats say? Less than 2% of contract traders claiming stable profits are still坚持 after a year Historical lessons tell us that in 2017, many people said the same thing I'm not trying to criticize, but anyone who can achieve a 50% monthly return would have already become part of the top 1% of global wealth, so why are they still writing articles? I just want to ask one question: When the market reverses and crashes, does your MA60 still work? Ironically, that last sentence is actually correct; risk control is indeed more important than暴利—unfortunately, focusing on 30% monthly returns clearly misses the point Interesting, this set of theories can win anyone in a bull market

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 01-03 08:51

This guy is right, but many people just can't listen... Honestly, it's still greed. They just can't accept the thrill of going all-in in one shot. But truth be told, with a monthly return of 30-50, either the method is truly excellent, or it's just selective talking. Under what market conditions can this kind of return be consistently maintained? I haven't experienced it myself. Position management is indeed the last line of defense against liquidation, but when the market hits, how many can really hold their ground... Wait, is this a review or recruiting? To be honest, the 4-hour chart focusing only on rebounds is indeed reliable, but execution is too difficult. Once there's floating loss, it's easy to lose confidence. I really admire the risk control part of this logic; a 15% daily loss limit is really tough. Most people have already been beaten so badly they can't fight back. Making steady money sounds simple, but in practice, it's really against human nature...

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 01-03 08:46

That's a nice way to put it. The data showing a 30-50% monthly increase should be examined—what time period, and what is the maximum drawdown? I feel like it's a bit exaggerated. Typical armchair strategist, only entering after the rebound reaches MA60; the market had already surged long before. The fixed position strategy isn't bad, but how many can actually implement it? Most still think about doubling down when losing money. Talking about theory is easy; the hard part is the mindset. When others get margin called, you're so sure it's a mindset issue? Try applying the 50% monthly growth logic in a bear market—probability strategies will also fail in extreme market conditions. Just want to ask, how long has this run from 100,000 to now? If it's less than a year, I can't help but find it hard to believe it's stable.

View OriginalReply0

ZenChainWalker

· 01-03 08:37

A reliable strategy boils down to these points; the key is whether you can stick with it. A monthly increase of 30-50% sounds a bit attractive, but the core of this method is risk control. A 15% daily loss limit is strict; I respect that. Only those who know how to cut losses can survive until the end. Holding no position often earns more than frequent trading; that's true. Many people just can't sit still. The logic for large and small funds is the same, only the multiples differ. This is very clear. Using a fixed position size may seem conservative, but it is actually the secret to long-term gains.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaximalist

· 01-03 08:34

ngl this reads like every trader who got lucky once and thinks they cracked the code... the "30-50% monthly" part is where i stop taking it serious, tbh. most ppl saying this either got wiped or are 6 months into a bull run thinking they're geniuses. network effects don't work that way in markets either.

Reply0

TradFiRefugee

· 01-03 08:26

Listening to this, there is indeed some substance, but I still have to question the 30 to 50 monthly increase. No matter how eloquently it's said, it's just talk; the key is whether it can truly be replicated, and that's the real issue. A fixed position system sounds like a retirement plan, but staying alive is indeed more important than making huge profits, and I agree with that.

View OriginalReply0