2026-01-02 06:22:15

I recently came across an interesting points system design—dividing points into two separate lines. One side is holder points, which can be accumulated gradually by stacking DUSD; the other side is trading points, generated through Perp trading. The cleverness of this division lies in its ability to reward loyal long-term holders while also incentivizing active traders. In simple terms, it quantifies the contributions of different users, allowing each to benefit in their own way. This dual-track incentive model can effectively enhance user stickiness in the early stages of a project and also enable ecosystem participants to profit from their areas of expertise.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenVelocity

· 6h ago

Hey, the dual-track points system is really awesome, it caters to both hoarders and trading enthusiasts, there's really something to it.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 6h ago

Dual-track incentives are a common trick; the key is whether the team can maintain the APY without dropping. Another "both/and" system design, history always repeats itself. Isn't this just liquidity mining 2.0? Just a different way of saying it. The opportunity to farm is here, but remember to check if there are hidden withdrawal fees in the smart contract. I'm actually interested in the holder points—what's the annualized rate? As long as it can resist inflation. Transaction points are easy for whales to manipulate, everyone knows that. TVL data needs on-chain verification; there are too many projects that sound good but are not.

View OriginalReply0

EthSandwichHero

· 6h ago

This dual-track system is indeed brilliant; finally, there's a project that understands us who are just lying flat and stacking coins.

View OriginalReply0

MrDecoder

· 7h ago

Hey, this dual-track design does have some merit, but I still think the key is how the final allocation ratio is decided. Each line operates independently, but can holding coins beat traders... that's a bit uncertain. Experienced designers just worry that the execution will fall into the same old routine. This approach will definitely make traders more active, but holders probably won't be marginalized, right? Interesting, but we’ll have to wait until it’s officially launched to see if it works. How can long-term holders even earn enough for gas fees? The dual-track mode is good, but these days, everything needs to consider scale. Small projects doing this are probably pointless. It looks balanced, but the market will have the final say.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsShaman

· 7h ago

The dual-track system is truly awesome—both passive income and trading can be profitable. That's what it means to understand user psychology.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuru

· 7h ago

I've seen this dual-track approach quite a few times. The key still depends on how the distribution ratio is set. In the end, traders get the meat, while those holding coins just sip the soup.

View OriginalReply0

ContractSurrender

· 7h ago

This design is indeed interesting, but I'm more concerned about what those points can finally be exchanged for... Just looking at it being fair isn't enough.

View OriginalReply0