The developer fee structure seems broken. There's clearly an issue with how these fees are currently being handled in the protocol. Worth looking into whether this is affecting incentive alignment for the dev team or creating friction in the ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopEscapeArtist
· 16h ago
The hidden danger of the fee structure should have been reviewed long ago. Historical experience tells me that misaligned incentives are a precursor to a head and shoulders top pattern.
View OriginalReply0
BuyHighSellLow
· 16h ago
The fee structure should have been shaken up long ago; why is it still dragging on?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 16h ago
The fee structure has always been a longstanding issue in previous protocols, and the development team is probably already exhausted from it.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 16h ago
It's the fee issue again; this trick is really getting old.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 16h ago
ngl, fee mechanics been the silent killer in too many protocols. like mile 18 vibes where everybody's hitting the wall at once—devs lose alignment, ecosystem stutters. gotta dig into those numbers fr fr
The developer fee structure seems broken. There's clearly an issue with how these fees are currently being handled in the protocol. Worth looking into whether this is affecting incentive alignment for the dev team or creating friction in the ecosystem.