2025-12-31 05:25:22

Injective delivered an impressive performance in the past year. From a tokenomics perspective, the optimization of INJ 3.0 inflation parameters was a highlight— the inflation floor was gradually adjusted to approximately 4.625%, while the cap was lowered to around 8.875%. This adjustment significantly strengthened the token's deflationary trajectory. Specifically, over 6.6 million INJ were burned throughout the year through community buybacks, burns, and other mechanisms. The deflationary effect has noticeably improved compared to previous years, sending a positive signal to long-term holders.

On the ecosystem side, innovation is accelerating. The upgrade to iAgent 2.0 and the subsequent AI agent hackathon mark new steps for Injective in exploring the integration of AI and on-chain trading. These initiatives not only enrich the ecosystem applications but also provide more experimentation space for developers and innovators. Looking at major events of the year, Injective is gradually strengthening its competitiveness in the Web3 ecosystem through these substantial progress.

INJ-5,43%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 01-02 05:42

According to my quantitative model, this wave of deflation parameter adjustments indeed has some substance. The burn amount of 6.6 million tokens looks good, but the key is whether subsequent execution can keep up. Historical data tells me that promises and actual results often diverge. The iAgent part is quite interesting. The AI concept is indeed a hot topic right now, but honestly, whether ecological applications can truly be implemented remains to be seen. Don't be fooled by the hype of hackathons; it depends on how many products can actually come out later. The inflation range has been lowered from 4.625% to 8.875%, which is a positive for traders. Long-term holders also receive a signal, but don't forget that the entire market cycle is still at the bottom. Relying solely on tokenomics improvements is not enough; we need to look at trading volume and real ecosystem data. I'm keeping an eye on this project, but there's no rush to get in now. Wait until the market shows a clearer bottoming pattern.

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 2025-12-31 23:16

6.6 million tokens burned? Let the on-chain evidence speak. I need to verify the transfer records of the wallet cluster myself... Feels like some numbers don't add up.

View OriginalReply0

StealthDeployer

· 2025-12-31 05:54

6.6 million tokens burned? That number sounds pretty good, but I don't know if it can really hold up in the end...

View OriginalReply0

PancakeFlippa

· 2025-12-31 05:52

6.6 million tokens destroyed sounds like a lot, but compared to the total circulation, it's really a drop in the bucket...🤔 Let's wait for the data before drawing conclusions.

View OriginalReply0

BridgeNomad

· 2025-12-31 05:34

tbh the tokenomics look solid on paper... but 6.6m inj burned? that's like watching liquidity fragmentation happen in slow motion. seen this deflation playbook before tho, usually precedes some gnarly counter-party risk nobody's talking about yet. iAgent 2.0 sounds promising until the first exploit postmortem drops, ngl.

Reply0

DegenWhisperer

· 2025-12-31 05:29

6.6 million tokens burned sounds impressive, but what percentage of the circulating supply does that represent? Is it really that significant?

View OriginalReply0