Recently, the actions in the Swiss financial circle have been quite interesting. On the surface, the Swiss National Bank previously stated that Bitcoin's volatility is too high and not suitable as a national reserve asset. But then they made a very telling decision — delaying the blockchain and asset tokenization pilot projects until 2027. This pace seems to suggest a soft-hearted stance behind a tough exterior.



The truly fascinating part is downstream. Large banking institutions like UBS and Sygnum have already partnered to complete interbank official payment settlements using public blockchains. This is not a small-scale test but a production-level application with legal binding. Using real funds to verify the reliability of blockchain technology is a bold move that is quite rare.

Looking at the overall trend in Swiss banking, the consensus is clear: Bitcoin as a reserve? Not considered for now. But tokenizing assets like stocks, bonds, and art, and then enabling efficient trading and settlement via blockchain? That’s the focus. The Swiss Bankers Association even released a report emphasizing that if they don’t push forward with stablecoins and tokenization schemes, the competitiveness of traditional banks will be eroded.

So, the key isn’t what they say, but what they do. When the most rule-abiding banks start deeply embracing the latest technology, what does that really signify? What’s your take?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhobiavip
· 12h ago
Stubborn on the surface but soft-hearted inside—that saying is just perfect. UBS's rhetoric has long been outdated. The reaction from traditional finance is actually forced; when stablecoins and tokenization truly start to move, they will be doomed if they don't follow. The decision-making power of this old-money group at UBS is beyond expectations. The 2027 pilot delay, I think, is just giving themselves enough time to lay out their plans and gradually nibble away. Their current stance is clear: they don't want Bitcoin, but the entire asset on-chain thing is a must-do. Using real funds to run production-level applications shows that internally, they've already unified their thinking; the surface-level show is just beginning.
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKeyvip
· 12h ago
Stubborn on the surface but soft-hearted in reality, but in fact, Switzerland is playing this game quite aggressively.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperervip
· 12h ago
The Swiss National Bank's move is truly impressive. On one hand, they say Bitcoin is not viable, and on the other hand, they secretly promote tokenization—classic policy lag. The key is that the banks below are also taking action; this is not a game when it comes to production-level applications.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)