A few days ago, I came across an interesting case. A publicly listed company invested 60 million in idle funds into a private equity fund. And the result? In less than 8 months, the account net value dropped from over 1 yuan to 0.1846 yuan, losing 46.92 million yuan, a decline of 81.54%. This is worth pondering.
Let's talk about the investment details. Between February and March 2025, the company, as a sole investor, signed a contract with the private fund manager to subscribe to an R4-level product (medium-high risk). The product covers equity, debt, futures, and derivatives, and also involves leverage operations like margin trading. It looks quite professional and has a risk control framework—no more than 25% of the fund's net assets in a single asset, with the fund manager required to disclose net asset value monthly and financial indicators quarterly.
Where's the problem? No matter how perfect the risk control framework is, it can't prevent market volatility. Especially when leverage is added to high-risk products, a market reversal can cause losses much faster than expected. By December, this investment had already hit a new record high in paper losses.
The most heartbreaking part is that, although the company is trying to find ways to remedy the situation, they frankly admitted that they might not recover this money. The loss has already exceeded 10% of the company's net profit for the past year, which will have a significant impact on next year's financial report.
This case serves as a warning to investors interested in private equity or high-risk investments: no matter how large the company or how strong the fund management background, it doesn't guarantee profits. Risk management is not just for show; leverage tools must be used cautiously, and even with plenty of idle funds, you need to think carefully about how much you could lose.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemeTokenGenius
· 9h ago
Leverage is really a killer. R4 is adding margin trading and securities lending. Isn't this just courting death?
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeir
· 9h ago
It should be pointed out that this case essentially serves as a paradoxical falsification of the Kelly formula—what appears to be a professional risk control framework becomes a rationalization for gamblers under leverage. Based on on-chain data and historical literature benchmarks, CDO products before the 2008 financial crisis also had similar "monthly disclosures" and "risk control indicators." And in the end? It is obvious that paper safety has always been self-deception by investors. The mistake made by this listed company is undoubtedly treating idle funds as an experimental field for unlimited losses, not realizing that R4 products combined with margin trading are essentially using your principal to bet against the market. Let me tell you, true risk management is never about institutional policies or regulations, but about personal restraint from greed—unfortunately, this is the rarest thing in human nature.
View OriginalReply0
NestedFox
· 9h ago
Leverage really is a ruthless game, even big companies are falling into traps. As small investors, it's better to play it safe.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTrader
· 9h ago
60 million in 8 months, lost down to 0.18. This guy is really using real money to teach everyone a lesson.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionist
· 9h ago
Leverage is really a trap. 60 million just disappeared like that. How ruthless must one be to keep holding on?
A few days ago, I came across an interesting case. A publicly listed company invested 60 million in idle funds into a private equity fund. And the result? In less than 8 months, the account net value dropped from over 1 yuan to 0.1846 yuan, losing 46.92 million yuan, a decline of 81.54%. This is worth pondering.
Let's talk about the investment details. Between February and March 2025, the company, as a sole investor, signed a contract with the private fund manager to subscribe to an R4-level product (medium-high risk). The product covers equity, debt, futures, and derivatives, and also involves leverage operations like margin trading. It looks quite professional and has a risk control framework—no more than 25% of the fund's net assets in a single asset, with the fund manager required to disclose net asset value monthly and financial indicators quarterly.
Where's the problem? No matter how perfect the risk control framework is, it can't prevent market volatility. Especially when leverage is added to high-risk products, a market reversal can cause losses much faster than expected. By December, this investment had already hit a new record high in paper losses.
The most heartbreaking part is that, although the company is trying to find ways to remedy the situation, they frankly admitted that they might not recover this money. The loss has already exceeded 10% of the company's net profit for the past year, which will have a significant impact on next year's financial report.
This case serves as a warning to investors interested in private equity or high-risk investments: no matter how large the company or how strong the fund management background, it doesn't guarantee profits. Risk management is not just for show; leverage tools must be used cautiously, and even with plenty of idle funds, you need to think carefully about how much you could lose.