2025-12-29 04:26:16

BNB's recent performance has attracted attention. Early this morning, 19,200 large-volume tokens were transferred into a leading exchange. This fund movement, involving multiple addresses, is typically characteristic of institutional-level strategies. On-chain data further shows that whale addresses' holdings have increased by 12% week-over-week, implying that major funds are quietly accumulating.

From a technical perspective, the key level of $865 has been tested three times but failed to break through, forming a clear bullish-bearish dividing line. Strong support is seen at $848, and combined with recent price action, an obvious "double bottom" pattern has emerged. Interestingly, when attempting to push to $870 yesterday, trading volume increased by 18%, but ultimately, the price couldn't stabilize, indicating some short-term selling pressure. However, the 9-day and 13-day cycle indicators have shown a rare golden cross, which usually signals that bullish momentum is building.

At this stage, this rally is not a "false breakout." Major players are using a "pullback after surge" approach to shake out weaker hands, effectively collecting more low-cost positions. If volume can break through $870 tonight, the target of $890 could be within reach. However, it’s worth noting that the $890 resistance may become a "last frenzy" zone—large profit-taking may occur here, leading to a quick $5-$10 correction.

In practical trading, several strategies are worth considering: existing holders can set a dynamic take-profit at $865, reducing 30% of their position if the price falls below, while keeping 70% to aim for a breakout. Those in cash should be more patient, placing orders in the $848-$855 range, with stop-loss immediately if the price drops below $848. For short-term traders, key is to monitor the 9-day/13-day cycle golden cross signals, combined with MACD histogram volume, to catch breakout opportunities on the 30-minute chart.

Overall, the upcoming trend warrants close attention, but all operations should be aligned with individual risk tolerance.

BNB-0,67%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BankruptWorker

· 10h ago

I've tested this 865 hurdle three times already. If I can't break through tonight, I'll just liquidate my position directly.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 10h ago

865 this level really got stuck, feels like the main force is teasing us --- 890 might really drop soon, don’t get caught off guard then --- Hey wait, is this golden cross real or just another trick to fool the rookies --- I’ve been optimistic about this wave for a while, just waiting for the 870 break, go BNB --- If the double bottom is confirmed, there’s definitely hope ahead, but I’m still worried about profit-taking at 890 --- Isn’t entering at 848 a good move? Why wait any longer --- I’ve heard the main force accumulating for so many times, and it always ends with a plunge --- Golden cross on the 9th and 13th? I don’t see it, was I fooled again --- This time is different, on-chain data is right here, whales are adding positions --- I bet it won’t reach $890, it’ll be hammered back in the middle --- For short-term trading, entering now is really rushing against time, can you really catch the bottom in just 30 minutes? --- I’ve already reduced by 30%, the rest can go as it will --- If I can’t break 865, I’ll admit defeat, anyway I haven’t lost much

View OriginalReply0

GasBandit

· 10h ago

865, this hurdle is really spooky. Three times and still can't get past it. Feels like the main force is deliberately messing with us. 890, is it a dream or a trap? I really have no confidence.

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 10h ago

The 865 level has been tested three times in a row without breaking through. Can it really succeed this time? It's a bit uncertain. Breaking 870 feels even harder than reaching the sky; the volume just isn't there. The double bottom pattern sounds good, but history often deceives. The main force's accumulation strategy is the same old trick, still just washing out retail investors' coins. I'm optimistic about 890, but caution is the key. The golden cross signal has appeared again. This time, it won't be another "wolf is coming," right? Institutional layout is just institutional layout. As retail investors, it's better to stay cautious. If the 848 support level is broken, I'll liquidate immediately—I don't want to get trapped. A volume increase of 18% and trying to break through? That's a bit too idealistic. Don't act now; wait until it drops below 850 before considering entering. No rush.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 10h ago

$865 has tested three times without breaking, this is testing our patience. As usual, risk control first. Treat the key levels as supply lines. Once they are lost, withdraw immediately. Don't wait to be surrounded. $890 is the real battlefield. By then, it will probably be a celebration for profit-taking. Be mentally prepared for a quick pullback. If $848 breaks, stop loss. This is not cowardice; it’s a necessary lesson to survive and leave the exchange alive. Watch the golden cross on the 9th and 13th, but data can be deceptive, eyes can deceive, only the account balance tells the truth. This wave of main force is shaking out the market. We just watch coldly from the side. When they reveal their true intentions, decide whether to enter or stay on the sidelines. Historical cycles tell me that after each "rise and fall" pattern, there will either be a surge or a crash. Can't gamble on it. Brothers holding positions, if $865 drops, reduce by 30%. Use the remaining to gamble on $890, at least psychologically it will feel better. For those without positions, don’t rush. There are plenty of good opportunities. The range from $848 to $855 is the real entry point.

View OriginalReply0