A recent phenomenon worth noting — a leading institution holding 473 million XRP is stuck in a loss trap, with unrealized losses exceeding $220 million. This organization, claiming to build the world's largest XRP asset reserve, entered at an average cost of about $2.44, and even chased higher to build positions at $2.54. Now, XRP is only fluctuating around $2.2.
This case exposes a market misconception. For a long time, retail investors have believed that professional institutions are "smart money" with market intuition beyond ordinary investors. But in reality, this institution's operational logic is no different from retail traders — repeatedly buying the dip during a downtrend, trying to dilute the average cost through dollar-cost averaging.
The problem is, this strategy, effective in traditional financial markets, fails in the crypto market. The volatility in the crypto space far exceeds that of stocks, bonds, and other traditional assets. Buying the dip strategy not only failed to turn the tide but also seemed to pour more capital into a deepening pit. If the trend doesn't reverse, each additional purchase only worsens the losses.
The difference between institutions and retail investors may not lie in market understanding but in psychological resilience and risk management. When the professional halo fades, what remains is the simplest investment principle: don't bet on the direction, manage the risks.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BetterLuckyThanSmart
· 10h ago
Haha, institutions also chase highs, so funny
---
The dollar-cost averaging method is just a joke in the crypto world; the more you buy, the worse it gets
---
Basically, it's a mindset issue; everyone is greedy
---
4.73 billion XRP was dumped, that's just outrageous
---
So, institutions are just people, nothing magical about them
---
Risk management? Does the crypto world have that?
---
Buying the dip works well in traditional markets, but it completely collapsed in the crypto world
---
Lost 220 million USD... If it were me, I would have already run away
---
The professional halo fades, and it's just a group of people gambling
---
If the trend doesn't reverse, increasing positions is like jumping into a fire pit
---
Institutions and retail investors are no different; both are just market victims
---
Real winners are quietly doing risk control, unlike those who just hard push
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 10h ago
Haha, even institutions are falling behind. The average cost method is just a joke in the crypto world.
Chasing high to 2.54 and still boasting about the asset pool—now it's all lost, serves you right.
Buying more on dips is a bottomless pit. This old trick should have been eliminated long ago.
So, even professional institutions are just that; risk management is the key.
Holding 473 million coins and still losing 220 million—this operation is truly outrageous.
Institutional investors and retail investors are essentially the same; both are driven by gambler mentality.
With such wild volatility in the crypto market, using stock trading strategies is pure suicide.
Managing risk is truly more important than anything else. This time, it's a lesson learned.
Ordinary retail investors at least dare to cut losses in time; institutions holding on stubbornly are even worse off.
Is this called professionalism? I think we're clearer-headed than those small retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
NftDeepBreather
· 10h ago
This institution is really good at adding positions, constantly smashing downward, truly demonstrating the mentality of retail investors to the fullest.
The dollar-cost averaging method is a joke in the crypto world—buying more as it falls? Then just wait to lose more and more.
Honestly, it's still greed at work, thinking you're the smart money, but in the end, you're still being cut.
Risk management is really the most overlooked thing; no matter how professional, it's useless.
Selling 2.2 knives without selling is quite embarrassing.
Institutions can also collapse; how many people need to wake up to this?
Buying the dip is an old trick that has long been outdated in the crypto world, yet some still play it.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Bandit
· 10h ago
lmao this is actually wild... 4.73B XRP bags getting rekt hard. thought institutions had better risk management tbh, guess that averaging down strategy doesn't work when you're fighting the actual market cycle, not just noise. mining pools could teach these guys something about difficulty adjustments fr
Reply0
DataBartender
· 11h ago
Haha, even institutions have to suffer losses. Now their mental balance is restored.
A recent phenomenon worth noting — a leading institution holding 473 million XRP is stuck in a loss trap, with unrealized losses exceeding $220 million. This organization, claiming to build the world's largest XRP asset reserve, entered at an average cost of about $2.44, and even chased higher to build positions at $2.54. Now, XRP is only fluctuating around $2.2.
This case exposes a market misconception. For a long time, retail investors have believed that professional institutions are "smart money" with market intuition beyond ordinary investors. But in reality, this institution's operational logic is no different from retail traders — repeatedly buying the dip during a downtrend, trying to dilute the average cost through dollar-cost averaging.
The problem is, this strategy, effective in traditional financial markets, fails in the crypto market. The volatility in the crypto space far exceeds that of stocks, bonds, and other traditional assets. Buying the dip strategy not only failed to turn the tide but also seemed to pour more capital into a deepening pit. If the trend doesn't reverse, each additional purchase only worsens the losses.
The difference between institutions and retail investors may not lie in market understanding but in psychological resilience and risk management. When the professional halo fades, what remains is the simplest investment principle: don't bet on the direction, manage the risks.