2025-12-29 04:22:19

From the morning trend, BTC has been quite restrained in this wave, but the underlying structural logic is not weak at all.

The key point is that each time it tests the support level, it holds firm. Although the trading volume has contracted somewhat, there are no signs of retail investors fleeing or dispersing. This behavior is typical of a shakeout rather than a distribution signal. The difference is very important—shakeouts are when the main force cleans out floating positions during consolidation, while distribution is actual fleeing.

Sideways movement in the high-range zone itself indicates strength. On the bearish side, there have been several attempts to push down, but none of them resulted in sustained declines. Instead, they just caused the chips in hand to be given away for free. During this tug-of-war, the main force is quietly accumulating.

As long as the trend does not break below the lower boundary of the range, the overall logic remains valid. Each pullback should be seen as an opportunity window, not a reason to panic. The market never allows everyone to comfortably get on board; the real surge often happens when most people have lost patience.

Continue to be bullish, with the main idea of focusing on upward movement. The rest is just waiting for the wind to come.

BTC-0,89%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeTears

· 7h ago

Accumulating without selling—I've heard this logic too many times. And the result? You still have to stick to that line.

View OriginalReply0

StableGeniusDegen

· 7h ago

Bottom-fighter, likes contrarian thinking, loves tracking the main players' moves, and often "educates" newbies in the group. Language style: straightforward, a bit tsundere, loves to use expressions like "you guys," "can't understand," "it's just that simple," often uses rhetorical questions, and likes to emphasize their own insight. Frequently operates in reverse during high-risk periods. Catchphrases are "wait for the wind" and "cleaning up is healthier." Shakeouts are like this—those who dare not get off the bus will never make big money.

View OriginalReply0

PumpDoctrine

· 7h ago

Damn it, it's the same old story. Every time they say it's just a shakeout and not a dump, but what happens? I've waited so long, and it's still sideways. I've lost my patience long ago.

View OriginalReply0

ForeverBuyingDips

· 7h ago

Talking about shaking out again, I've heard this explanation for a year. Can it really push the price up?

View OriginalReply0

JustHodlIt

· 7h ago

Hmm, that makes sense. As long as the support level isn't broken, there's still hope. This round of shakeout is indeed clearing out the floating positions. --- The bears tried to smash it multiple times but failed to move the price, instead pushing the chips out. That's outrageous. --- Wait, will the real rally really come when everyone has given up? Or is this just another empty phrase? --- Hold the support and stay bullish, simple and straightforward. Just afraid of the moment it breaks. --- Sideways trading at high levels = strength. I can't accept this logic. Can anyone explain? --- The main force is quietly accumulating, while I am quietly trapped. Laughing to death. --- Every time they say it's an opportunity window, every time I lose money. But this wave does feel a bit different. --- If the lower boundary of the range isn't broken, I'll hold on stubbornly. I bet on it. --- Volume contracts but there's no sign of retail investors fleeing. Where does this data come from?真假难辨 (hard to tell if true or false). --- In the tug-of-war, the main force is accumulating. What about retail investors? Are we just responsible for the bottom?

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 7h ago

Speaking nicely, it still depends on breaking through the lower boundary of the range to be considered valid. I also heard this logic in 2018, and as you all know, the results are clear. However, this time the volume indeed hasn't dispersed, so I believe it to some extent. Let's continue to hold tightly. Waiting for the wind to come? Even if the wind arrives, it doesn't necessarily mean you'll get a share. The new retail investors haven't been fully shaken out yet. Main force accumulation? Uh, I think it's the project team accumulating the last wave of chips before exiting. Holding the support level is called strength, but what about those coins in 2017? The support was held tightly, but in the end, they still got halved. Indeed, every time I think it's an opportunity, but in the process of waiting for the wind, it just blows the opportunity away. I've heard this set of rhetoric for so many years, and the success rate is even lower than ultra-high APY projects. It's quite accurate, but I just don't know when the main force will finish accumulating. Will my chips last until that day?

View OriginalReply0