The early trading session showed a clear divergence in funding rates. GAS reported a negative rate of -1.02%, while BIGTIME and GMT retreated to -0.44% and -0.58% respectively. These data reflect a subtle shift in market sentiment.
Speaking of low-market-cap tokens, RVV is a typical example. Many people are unsure about the upward momentum, hesitant to build long positions initially, and later worried about being caught in a short squeeze and taking a loss. This actually puts them in a passive position. Industry observers generally note that since the decline in popularity of BEAT and PIPPIN, the big players are definitely strategizing for the next target, needing to establish a new investment narrative to attract participants. The logical chain is clear: old hot spots cool down → new tokens take over → market sentiment shifts. Instead of fixating on a single trading approach, it’s better to seize this cycle transition opportunity and proactively position for those assets that could become the next hot spots.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfMadeRuggee
· 9h ago
The differentiation of rates is indeed interesting; the bears are testing the waters.
I've long stopped touching RVV; I got burned chasing the high before. Now I'm just waiting for the next hot spot to appear.
BEAT and PIPPIN are done, right? The big players are probably brewing another big move. Cycles just keep repeating.
Rather than passively getting caught, it's better to sit tight and wait for the next opportunity. But the question is, who can really predict it accurately?
This narrative changes too quickly; before I can react, the hot spot is gone.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegen
· 9h ago
ngl those negative funding rates are literally screaming capitulation... GAS at -1.02% got me watching the order flow like a hawk rn. every time the market structure breaks like this, some whale's definitely loading bags somewhere we can't see yet
Reply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 9h ago
ngl the funding rate spreads here are actually taxonomically revealing—negative across the board suggests we're witnessing a systematic liquidation cascade, not organic sentiment shift. let me pull up my spreadsheet real quick because those decimals tell a different story than the narrative being peddled.
Reply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 9h ago
Negative fee rates are so obvious; retail investors should be educated as well.
I just want to know how far RVV can go in this round.
BEAT has cooled down; who will be the next sucker to step in? Honestly, I can't quite predict.
It's the same old trick—new hot spots taking over old ones, just empty narratives.
With such a sharp divergence in fee rates, be careful.
The big players have been signaling this early in the session; those who understand, understand.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecue
· 9h ago
Rate differentiation this wave, you really need to grasp the rhythm
Low market cap assets like RVV are just like this; those who swing around will end up getting beaten badly
Once BEAT cools down, new stories will definitely emerge; this is the cycle of rotation
Don't get stuck on long or short positions, you still need to catch the bottoms of those about to rise
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivor
· 9h ago
The divergence in rates is so obvious, it indicates there are still disagreements in the market.
I really can't understand the rhythm of RVV; let's wait for the next one to appear and see.
BEAT cooled down, PIPPIN also cooled down. What's the next hot topic? I always feel like I'm one step behind.
Rather than chasing highs, it's better to wait for clear signals before acting.
Has anyone bottomed out in this wave?
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddict
· 9h ago
Negative fee rates are so obvious, is GAS about to rebound?
---
I'm already tired of coins like RVV, aren't there still many caught chasing the high?
---
Is a new hot spot coming? When BEAT dies, it's time for a new scapegoat.
---
Instead of waiting for a new narrative, it's better to just buy the dip; after all, it's all just routines.
---
What are the market makers planning... retail investors are just waiting to be harvested.
---
The fee rate divergence is so big, it feels like a trend reversal is coming.
---
Every time they talk about the next hot spot, those who talk about the previous one are all losing money.
---
PIPPIN has only been out for a few days, and now they're looking for a new sucker?
The early trading session showed a clear divergence in funding rates. GAS reported a negative rate of -1.02%, while BIGTIME and GMT retreated to -0.44% and -0.58% respectively. These data reflect a subtle shift in market sentiment.
Speaking of low-market-cap tokens, RVV is a typical example. Many people are unsure about the upward momentum, hesitant to build long positions initially, and later worried about being caught in a short squeeze and taking a loss. This actually puts them in a passive position. Industry observers generally note that since the decline in popularity of BEAT and PIPPIN, the big players are definitely strategizing for the next target, needing to establish a new investment narrative to attract participants. The logical chain is clear: old hot spots cool down → new tokens take over → market sentiment shifts. Instead of fixating on a single trading approach, it’s better to seize this cycle transition opportunity and proactively position for those assets that could become the next hot spots.