2025-12-29 03:30:56

MON currently has a market capitalization of only $250 million, with a circulating supply ratio of just 10%. This data is worth paying close attention to. Why? Ultimately, when a coin's circulating supply is still relatively small and the price happens to be low, there is more room for growth, and the difficulty of price increases is lower.

Looking at the mainstream cryptocurrencies in the market, many of them follow this pattern in the early stages — low circulation rate, yet the price can soar to astonishing heights. However, this situation usually doesn't last long. As the circulating supply gradually increases, price pressure follows, and the upward momentum significantly weakens.

Of course, this logic isn't absolute. Ultimately, it depends on whether the project team can build a robust application ecosystem and increase market share, which will determine the ceiling of the price trend. Purely low circulating supply only provides potential, not a guarantee.

MON-8,84%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TokenomicsPolice

· 9h ago

10% circulation volume is indeed more of a trap than an opportunity It's the same old logic, how many times have we been caught in it before Low circulation volume ≠ guaranteed low price, it also depends on whether the project can truly be implemented How is the MON project ecosystem? I haven't heard of any applications Be careful of the release wave, otherwise someone will lose their entire investment

View OriginalReply0

YieldChaser

· 12-29 03:59

Low circulation + low price, sounds very tempting, but how many can really take off? Don't just focus on the hundredfold dream; the ecosystem is the real key. A market cap of 250 million, not too big, not too small; the main thing is whether the team is reliable. We've seen this trick many times; the real test is when it's released. 10% circulation sounds great, but think about it the other way around—it's also a hidden risk.

View OriginalReply0

AmateurDAOWatcher

· 12-29 03:53

Low circulation volume and just hoping to win by default? Dream on, it also depends on whether the ecosystem can take off. --- I'm tired of this old script with 10% circulating supply; every time it’s hyped up, but in the end, it’s just a mess. --- A market cap of 250 million and a quick rise? Honestly, it still depends on the mood of the whales. --- If the ecosystem doesn’t keep up, everything else is pointless. Don’t just focus on circulation volume alone. --- This logic sounds familiar, feels like any coin can be fitted into it. --- The question is, how many projects can truly build a solid ecosystem? What are the chances? --- Low circulation with high gains sounds great, but the risks are also significant.

View OriginalReply0

SigmaValidator

· 12-29 03:52

Low circulation and high expectations, I've seen this pattern too many times Don't just get excited because the market cap is small; the key is whether the ecosystem can sustain it Feels like another "possibility" coin; we'll only know once it's truly released

View OriginalReply0

CommunityJanitor

· 12-29 03:46

Low circulating supply doesn't matter if the project team can't deliver real results; otherwise, it's just an empty coin.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 12-29 03:43

Low liquidity markets are really easy to overestimate. What sounds good as a potential gem is actually a hidden minefield. I've heard this kind of statement too many times. In the end, it still depends on whether the ecosystem can keep up. The real issue is whether the project team has actual implementation. If not, even the lowest market cap is useless.

View OriginalReply0

LightningLady