#加密货币ETF The pioneer executive spoke frankly, but there are logical flaws. They question Bitcoin's lack of cash flow and compound interest features, which is problematic in itself—gold also has no cash flow, so why is it still recognized by institutions? The key point is that they have already opened the trading permissions for crypto ETFs, which is a compromise with market realities.

From a copy-trading perspective, such comments are actually signals. Every time traditional giants publicly downplay, it often means they are already allocating. Institutions with assets of 12 trillion yuan wouldn't open trading windows without reason—they need to meet client demands, and these demands themselves indicate a shift in market perception.

My observation is that crypto ETFs have now become one of the asset allocation options. There's no need to get caught up in old investment logic debates; the focus should be on who is genuinely following through with real money. The spot Bitcoin ETF established a tracking record last year, which is already sufficient for institutional clients.

In terms of copy-trading strategies, such news often signals a rebalancing point. Traders who have already positioned themselves in the crypto space will maintain their resolve amid traditional financial skepticism; those chasing the trend are more susceptible to public opinion interference. You should observe who can stick to their logic amid the noise, rather than being swayed by executive remarks. That’s the true character of someone worth following.