#比特币与黄金战争 $ETH At the 3003 level, I decided to go short. The logic isn't that complicated.
First, look at the psychological level—between 3000 and 3050. Historically, this has been a clear area of dense trading activity, with persistent selling pressure. Every time it pushes up, it’s difficult and unprofitable.
More importantly, volume. This recent rebound looks good, but the trading volume is actually decreasing—this is a typical case of a price spike without increased volume. It’s less of a trend initiation and more like a false breakout.
As long as it doesn’t stabilize above 3050, the bearish logic remains intact. Looking downward, 2950 and even 2900 are reasonable adjustment levels from a structural perspective. This trade isn’t about betting on a top, but about shorting below the pressure level in a trend-following manner.
I’ve found that the most terrifying thing in ranging markets isn’t a sudden change in direction, but the loss of trading logic. Don’t always think about missing the move, and don’t get emotionally hijacked. Returning to technical analysis itself—focusing on support and resistance levels—trading can become very clean.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetadataExplorer
· 8h ago
Shorting 3003? I agree with the declining volume, but if 3050 really breaks, doesn't your logic also need to break?
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 8h ago
If 3050 doesn't hold steady, 2900 is right around the corner. The declining volume indicates everything clearly. This wave indeed looks like a false breakout... I also need to adjust the ETH ratio in my multi-signature wallet and protect the principal well.
View OriginalReply0
BTCRetirementFund
· 8h ago
If 3050 can't be broken, then keep pushing down; this logic makes sense. The decline in trading volume is really the biggest signal, and it always traps people like this.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalk
· 8h ago
The 3000 level repeatedly is really annoying; declining volume is a signal, and fake breakouts are seen too often.
---
It's most annoying when it rises sharply without increasing volume. If it keeps doing this, I need to stay alert.
---
I respect a clear logic, but I'm just worried this order might become a reverse indicator haha.
---
The idea of shorting at resistance levels in line with the trend is fine, but the key is to stick to stop-loss and not be reckless.
---
Exactly, don't get caught up in FOMO; technical analysis is the real thing.
---
Before breaking 3050 firmly, it's all fake; see you at 2950.
#比特币与黄金战争 $ETH At the 3003 level, I decided to go short. The logic isn't that complicated.
First, look at the psychological level—between 3000 and 3050. Historically, this has been a clear area of dense trading activity, with persistent selling pressure. Every time it pushes up, it’s difficult and unprofitable.
More importantly, volume. This recent rebound looks good, but the trading volume is actually decreasing—this is a typical case of a price spike without increased volume. It’s less of a trend initiation and more like a false breakout.
As long as it doesn’t stabilize above 3050, the bearish logic remains intact. Looking downward, 2950 and even 2900 are reasonable adjustment levels from a structural perspective. This trade isn’t about betting on a top, but about shorting below the pressure level in a trend-following manner.
I’ve found that the most terrifying thing in ranging markets isn’t a sudden change in direction, but the loss of trading logic. Don’t always think about missing the move, and don’t get emotionally hijacked. Returning to technical analysis itself—focusing on support and resistance levels—trading can become very clean.
Stay tuned: $ZEC $RVV