Seeing certain low-market-cap tokens plummet significantly, many entrants think this is a bargain opportunity. Especially when they are labeled as "Telegraph ecosystem leading protocol," people naturally assume they can ride this wave.
But the reality is much more complicated. Although the Telegraph ecosystem is quite popular, tokens in this sector often underperform. The reasons are not hard to understand—team execution varies, marketing strategies are not very clear, and the underlying technology is quite ordinary. Projects that seem to have a story often struggle with implementation, operations, and product iteration.
A market cap of just over 7 million sounds very low, but low market cap has never been a reason to buy. What truly matters are the project's actual progress, the team's past track record, and genuine user retention within the ecosystem. Blindly chasing ecosystem concepts is often the first step to becoming a bagholder.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaDreamer
· 9h ago
Thinking of bottom-fishing with low market value? Wake up, this is just the beginning of getting stuck with the bag.
Ecological concepts sound appealing, but if the team isn't capable, it's all in vain.
How many projects have relied on marketing stories to harvest investors? Few are truly capable of pumping the market.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermit
· 13h ago
Low market cap but still dare to get in, brothers, you need to change this mindset
---
Telegraph ecosystem leader? Just forget about it, let's wait until the financial report is out
---
It's the same old story, only stories without execution power, I've been burned enough already
---
Is a 7 million market cap cheap? The cheap ones are always the coffin money for the bagholders
---
Poor team, poor technology, can't even retain users, what cheapness are you talking about
---
The ecosystem concept can't be hyped anymore, are you still hoping these low market cap things will turn around?
---
It's always like this, all talk and no substance behind the big names
---
The question is, who the hell can tell which is a real project and which is just cutting leeks?
---
Whenever I see the term "ecosystem leader," I just pass it by, it's too evil
---
Poor execution and still have the nerve to ask for funding, what's the logic behind this?
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 13h ago
Low market cap and thinking about bottom fishing? Wake up, brother, I've seen this trick too many times
---
I've long stopped touching things from the Telegraph ecosystem, they're all story tellers
---
Another concept coin, waiting to be cut down
---
Watching whitepapers with flashy designs, but once you ask about technical details, they get exposed. These projects are really not worth it
---
I just want to ask, who has really made money in this ecosystem? Drop a comment if you have
---
Low market cap = low risk? Laughs, this logic is so absurd
---
The team's execution is weak, no matter how good the concept is, it's useless. That's a fact
---
Every time they talk about leading protocols, they end up becoming the leading chives
---
User retention is the real indicator, but unfortunately most people don't even look and just jump in
---
That bunch of projects from Telegraph are basically a game of passing the flower
View OriginalReply0
ThesisInvestor
· 13h ago
Low market cap = low risk? This logic is really amazing haha
The story of becoming a bag holder starts with trusting the "ecological leader"
It's just a story, just a concept, but who's actually doing the work?
The team's execution is weak, the technology is mediocre, how did it become a leader?
Just looking at the low market cap and rushing in, serves you right
I've seen many projects like this, and in the end, it's all the same routine
Challenge difficulty: distinguish true value from pure storytelling
A market cap of seven million sounds cheap, but the speed of giving is fast
Having a track record and user retention is real data
Telegraph ecosystem is hot, but how many are actually making money?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrier
· 13h ago
The low market cap trap is here again, time to wake up
Seeing certain low-market-cap tokens plummet significantly, many entrants think this is a bargain opportunity. Especially when they are labeled as "Telegraph ecosystem leading protocol," people naturally assume they can ride this wave.
But the reality is much more complicated. Although the Telegraph ecosystem is quite popular, tokens in this sector often underperform. The reasons are not hard to understand—team execution varies, marketing strategies are not very clear, and the underlying technology is quite ordinary. Projects that seem to have a story often struggle with implementation, operations, and product iteration.
A market cap of just over 7 million sounds very low, but low market cap has never been a reason to buy. What truly matters are the project's actual progress, the team's past track record, and genuine user retention within the ecosystem. Blindly chasing ecosystem concepts is often the first step to becoming a bagholder.