Solana DEX Arbitrage Deep Dive: Is 50% of Aggregator Trading Actually Arbitrage?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【ChainNews】In the Solana DEX trading ecosystem, how rampant are arbitrage activities? Recently, an analyst compiled some data that is quite shocking.

Let’s first discuss the two types of arbitrage strategies. One is called atomic arbitrage, which is straightforward—buy low on one DEX and sell high on another DEX within a single transaction, capturing the price difference. The other is called portfolio arbitrage, which is similar but involves a broader scope, executing multiple transactions within the same block to realize arbitrage.

The current question is: how do these arbitrage bots operate? Not everyone runs their own custom programs. Many trades are actually routed through aggregator platforms like Jupiter and DFlow. This is the key point.

The data is eye-opening. Jupiter accounts for about 90% of the market share in the Solana DEX aggregator space, and at least 40% of the trading volume on this platform is pure atomic arbitrage. Approximately 60% of all DEX trades on Solana go through aggregators. What does this mean? Just through Jupiter alone, atomic arbitrage accounts for about 22% of the total Solana DEX trading volume.

But that’s not all. If portfolio arbitrage is included, the share of arbitrage trades on Jupiter jumps from 40% directly to 50%. As a result, the total arbitrage trading proportion on DEXs surges to around 27%. Plus, considering arbitrage trades from DFlow and other aggregators, it is estimated that arbitrage transactions tracked through aggregator channels account for about 30% of all DEX trading volume on Solana.

Conservatively speaking, at least half of the trades on Solana DEXs are arbitrage transactions. In some days, this ratio can reach 60% to 70%. This does not even include other types of arbitrage strategies.

This data reflects a phenomenon: the concentration of aggregators is increasing, and the activity of arbitrage bots is also rising. While they profit from the price differences, they also, to some extent, influence the liquidity distribution and trading efficiency within the Solana ecosystem.

SOL0,16%
JUP-3,06%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Web3Educatorvip
· 15h ago
honestly jupiter being 90% of the flow while half the volume is just bots eating spreads... this is why i always tell my students the market structure matters more than the token itself, fundamentally speaking
Reply0
GweiWatchervip
· 15h ago
Jupiter 90% market share, 40% arbitrage trading? These numbers really can't be sustained anymore. It feels like aggregators are just arbitrage robot paradises.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForAirdropsvip
· 15h ago
Haha, 50% arbitrage? Jupiter is directly becoming an arbitrage intermediary, I'm really speechless.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 15h ago
40% arbitrage? Are you joking? Jupiter is just giving a backdoor to robots... What percentage of actual retail traders are there?
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 16h ago
40% Pure Arbitrage? Is Jupiter creating an aggregator for robots or a cash machine for retail investors? Laughing to death --- No, this data is really outrageous. It feels like every trade on Jupiter is being exploited for profit --- The problem is, who is eating the slippage in these 50% arbitrage trades? It's us retail investors. So true --- No wonder I always find the prices on aggregators to be so "strange," turns out they’re being manipulated by arbitrage bots --- So, as long as Jupiter holds 90% of the market share, this arbitrage ecosystem will be hard to break. It’s an inevitable issue --- Honestly, this actually shows that Solana’s DEX liquidity is sufficiently decentralized. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be able to make such profits, right? --- Wait, did I understand this correctly? Is 40% arbitrage a good thing or a bad thing? Feels quite contradictory --- Bots are earning, aggregators are earning, only users are losing. This is the real state of DeFi right now
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClassvip
· 16h ago
lmao 40% arbitrage on Jupiter... so we're basically watching a sophisticated casino where the house always wins. reminds me of how every bubble eventually becomes dominated by extractive mechanics before the collapse. history rhymes—always does.
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt