By the end of 2025, Bitcoin mining difficulty just reached a record high of 148.26T, and industry insiders expect it may break through the 149T mark in January. This number looks intimidating, but the underlying logic is worth pondering.



Why is the difficulty still climbing? Simply put, it’s because global capital is truly betting real money on Bitcoin. Even after experiencing volatility in October, professional mining companies in North America, the Middle East, and Latin America are still accelerating the deployment of new machines. These players are not blindly throwing resources; they are well aware that the 2026 halving is coming. Locking in low-cost hash power now is essentially preempting future scarce returns.

From a network perspective, rising difficulty = increased security level = skyrocketing attack costs. Each difficulty adjustment makes attacking Bitcoin exponentially more expensive. This self-forming market defense system is a unique advantage that cannot be replicated by other assets, reinforcing BTC’s status as digital gold.

For participants, this stage is actually a period of strategic positioning. Small miners are gradually exiting, industry concentration is increasing, and the network will become more stable. Once the price breaks through a critical level, such high difficulty will instead create a natural ceiling for hash power—new hash power cannot enter, supply is locked, and demand is surging. This is a resonance opportunity.

149T is not an obstacle; it’s a proof of growth. The harder it is to mine, the more valuable the assets become.
BTC-0,29%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FloorPriceWatchervip
· 14h ago
148T is already in place. The little miners should be crying, this is the game played by big capital. The logic of the hashing power ceiling is indeed brilliant. When the coin price rises, it's the moment to harvest the leeks. The higher the difficulty, the more valuable it is? Sounds like you're just finding reasons to hold. The big players are deploying madly, betting on the halving market. Will the 2026 halving be another leek-cutting game? When will 148T double? Feels like it's too late to enter now. The defense system sounds good, but honestly, it just means fewer miners can participate. Is this a stealth period? Or a period of cutting losses? So conflicted. The hashing power ceiling move is brilliant. When new players can't come in, maybe us old leeks can make a profit?
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourervip
· 14h ago
149T is really just the beginning. Major institutions have already been laying the groundwork, while small retail investors are still struggling with the difficulty. It's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
0xOverleveragedvip
· 14h ago
149T this hurdle, to put it simply, is the big players playing a high-stakes game Small miners really need to consider switching careers; the difficulty and competition leave no room for survival The higher the difficulty, the stronger the security; this logic is sound, but retail investors are really in a bit of a dilemma this time On the eve of the 2026 halving, gaining more hash power is like securing a ticket to the future Is this another bear market ambush period? I feel like I say this every time Will this increase in concentration become a risk instead... High difficulty = high value, there's some truth to that
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivorvip
· 14h ago
Putting real money into it makes a difference. This wave of small miners is indeed in danger. What does the skyrocketing difficulty indicate? It shows that institutions have long seen through the halving. This logic makes sense: supply is locked, demand explodes. If a resonance market really occurs, how can small retail investors play? 148T has already held steady, and 149T isn't far away. Feeling a bit tempted but also a bit scared—what's going on? Higher safety costs are better. One attack could bankrupt you—that's the true moat. The analogy of the hashing power ceiling is good; it feels like you can't even get in. It's okay if small miners drop out; it actually clarifies the market more. Isn't that a good thing? Higher difficulty ≈ more stability? This logic reminds me of last year's arguments. Looking back, it's still correct. Resonance opportunities—but the key question is, who can copy to the end? That's the critical point. The harder it is to mine, the more valuable it is. I like this phrase; it gives a sense of invincibility.
View OriginalReply0
StableCoinKarenvip
· 14h ago
148T still isn't enough, so they have to keep pushing higher. Honestly, the computing power arms race is a bit crazy.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)