2025-12-29 00:50:20

#数字资产市场动态 Can Ethereum break through 8500? Many people are optimistic about this rebound momentum.$ETH $BTC $BNB These three mainstream cryptocurrencies have recently performed remarkably well.

To be honest, the key still depends on the ETF developments—this thing genuinely impacts market sentiment. Many people haven't moved their holdings yet, but they have some doubts in their minds. Should they continue to hold, or reduce their positions on rallies? Currently, there are different reasons for each approach.

What’s your view? Are you optimistic or cautious about this market trend?

ETH-0,41%

BTC-0,29%

BNB-0,67%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseHobo

· 13h ago

8500 is too optimistic. I'll wait and see how the ETF performs before making any decisions.

View OriginalReply0

NightAirdropper

· 13h ago

ETFs are indeed crucial this time, but I still think too many people are just gambling. --- Whether 8500 breaks or not, honestly, it depends on when the big institutions start to move. --- You still need to hold onto your coins; otherwise, missing out will be even more painful. --- Currently, those entering the market are gambling, I choose to wait and see. --- The rebound strength is good, but it feels a bit fake; be cautious. --- Whether ETH can hold steady this time is the real test; breaking 8500 would be pointless. --- Cautious traders are online; too many people are cutting losses, and I don't want to be one of them.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 13h ago

8500? Dreaming? It still depends on how the institutional players play. Wait, the ETF thing is indeed a variable. Holding onto the coins in hand also feels uncomfortable. I'm a reductionist; being more conservative is never wrong.

View OriginalReply0