2025-12-28 05:22:29

Ethereum's Tech Choice: Why RISC-V Won Over eWASM

At Pragma Taipei this April, Vitalik Buterin sat down to discuss one of Ethereum's most significant technical pivot points. The question on everyone's mind: why did the network move away from eWASM to RISC-V?

The story starts with ambition. eWASM was supposed to be the solution—a fresh replacement for the EVM's known limitations. Clean code, better performance, a real upgrade path. But execution is where theory meets reality.

Timing became the killer. While Ethereum pushed toward The Merge, eWASM development hit roadblocks. The delays stacked up. RISC-V emerged as a pragmatic alternative—lighter, faster to implement, with broader ecosystem support already in place.

Vitalik laid out the trade-offs plainly. RISC-V brought faster iteration cycles and lower technical debt. eWASM, though theoretically elegant, demanded more development resources than the timeline allowed. Sometimes the best tech isn't the one that wins—it's the one that ships.

For developers and protocol researchers watching the evolution of Ethereum's execution layer, this shift signals a maturation in thinking: flexibility beats perfection when you're building live infrastructure. The network moves forward, learning as it scales.

ETH-0,88%

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ser_aped.eth

· 2025-12-30 23:11

NGL, RISC-V winning is purely a matter of time. No matter how elegant ewasm is, it has to go live... This is the reality of Web3.

View OriginalReply0

RunWhenCut

· 2025-12-30 05:29

Basically, reality has defeated ideals. No matter how elegant eWASM is, it's useless now that the tickets are issued and the design plans are still being modified... RISC-V is the方案 that can get on board, and this is the pragmatic approach of engineers.

View OriginalReply0

Fren_Not_Food

· 2025-12-29 10:13

Basically, it's about practicality over idealism. No matter how elegant eWASM is, it has to be shippable to count.

View OriginalReply0

FUDwatcher

· 2025-12-28 05:52

Honestly, this is a classic example of pragmatism defeating idealism. No matter how elegant eWASM is, it has to be delivered on time.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSpy

· 2025-12-28 05:52

RISC-V wins, so what if it wins? Anyway, eWASM, no matter how elegant, is useless. Being usable is the key, that's the reality.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 2025-12-28 05:51

nah, this is just cope dressed up as pragmatism. risc-v won because evasm became a black swan event waiting to happen—classic systemic risk management disguised as technical wisdom. shipping broken is still shipping broken, just slower.

Reply0

degenwhisperer

· 2025-12-28 05:36

NGL RISC-V pragmatism won, eWASM was too idealistic... reality is this cruel

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 2025-12-28 05:31

Basically, it's just that ideals are very lofty, but reality is quite harsh. The eWASM setup sounds awesome, but it gets stuck in the timeline and can't move, while RISC-V takes advantage of the situation. If I could see Ethereum also learn to "release first, perfect later" in my lifetime, that change in mindset would truly be worth it.

View OriginalReply0

ResearchChadButBroke

· 2025-12-28 05:28

NGL, at the end of the day, the philosophy of "ship it" wins. Perfectionism always loses in the face of reality... RISC-V may not be the most elegant solution, but it works. That's what infrastructure should look like.

View OriginalReply0