Tracking launcher patterns and historical project performance reveals some concerning trends worth monitoring. A track record involving multiple project failures raises serious questions about current initiatives. BlackWhale and similar tokens warrant careful scrutiny—investors should review founder history, tokenomics, and community engagement before participating. The Magma situation exemplifies how similar project structures can repeat problematic patterns. Due diligence on team backgrounds, fund management, and exit strategies remains critical. Community members sharing historical data points help others make informed decisions. What red flags are you watching in new launches?

MAGMA8,74%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MonkeySeeMonkeyDovip
· 7h ago
BlackWhale那套路我早看透了,founder history一查就漏馅儿
Reply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 7h ago
Here we go again with another project falling into a trap... I've seen this trick of BlackWhale too many times.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamervip
· 7h ago
Another cycle of pump and dump tricks, no matter how fancy the names like BlackWhale or Magma, they all end up with a failed finish.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBrovip
· 7h ago
NGL, this move is the old trick again, history always looks surprisingly similar...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWangvip
· 7h ago
Another bunch of failed projects... BlackWhale's old tricks again, I can't sleep without checking the founder's background thoroughly.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)