2025-12-26 11:20:54

现在看盘面，MACD快慢线就算出现金叉，也未必是那种两情相悦式的强势金叉。所以这个位置我的建议是先按住，让行情自己去修复。耐心等，等什么呢？等绿柱出来后再跌，最起码一个小时K线要能跌出三根以上的红柱。这时候再看15分钟级别，一旦确认两情相悦的金叉信号，这才是真正的入场机会。说白了，位置对了但信号还没到位，硬是不能进。这就是交易的核心——很多人觉得交易难，其实难就难在市场瞬息万变。但你要是搞清楚了自己要的具体位置和信号是什么，难度就大大降低了。与其频繁出手，不如精准等待。

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MissingSats

· 11h ago

Hold on, don't move. This signal hasn't matured yet. --- It's the same old story of waiting, my hands are getting itchy. --- Damn, I need to remember the saying "mutual affection," it's definitely not something to enter into casually. --- Precise waiting sounds easy, but how many people can really hold back? --- It's heartbreaking when the position is right but the signal is wrong; I've stepped on too many pits. --- The difficulty lies in the rapid changes, but who can truly grasp it? --- The standard of three red bars sounds refreshing, but executing it is another matter. --- Instead of frequently making moves, it's better to wait precisely. Everyone understands the principle, but can't do it.

View OriginalReply0

WalletsWatcher

· 11h ago

Bro, I really agree with this logic, but too many people can't do it. Jumping in without proper signals is basically suicide. You still need to stay calm and wait for that perfect moment to appear.

View OriginalReply0

InfraVibes

· 11h ago

Hold on, wait for the signal before taking action—that's the right way. It's better to stay calm and wait rather than act recklessly; the market can't run away anyway. Well said, having the right position but the wrong signal is just asking for trouble. So many people get caught up in frequent trading, really. The logic is clear, but execution is really a torture. Waiting for three consecutive red bars is indeed a bit strict, but it's safer.

View OriginalReply0