#美联储回购协议计划 Next year’s Q1 may bring a good market window, but the prerequisite is that new trigger conditions need to mature.
The Federal Reserve’s policy orientation after the change in leadership emphasizes growth, and the market’s adjustment of interest rate expectations for next year has basically confirmed an optimistic outlook for the first quarter. But here’s an interesting point — policy implementation takes time to ferment, and sentiment changes often lead fundamental shifts.
Remember the big election a few years ago? Early market pricing of candidates was mainly based on their stance supporting crypto development. During that period, market reactions to related statements were particularly sensitive; a single tweet could move prices, demonstrating the power of short-term sentiment pricing. Risk assets’ attitude towards policymakers is essentially a form of emotional management, especially evident in assets like $BTC and $ETH .
If opportunities do not appear as scheduled in the first quarter, then continue to wait for the third quarter — this is based on my judgment of the cycle’s timing. There are basically no expectations for the second quarter, as various buffering factors are not favorable, and performance expectations are rather bleak.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProxyCollector
· 5h ago
A single tweet can move the price, this is the era we live in. Essentially, emotional management is a game.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-26d7f434
· 12h ago
A single tweet can move the price, this is solid evidence that we live in an emotional market.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 12h ago
The logic of sentiment-based pricing has definitely been played out for a few rounds. The era where a single tweet could move the price is probably over...
View OriginalReply0
DuckFluff
· 12h ago
Will Q1 really arrive, or do we have to wait until Q3 again...
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 12h ago
Q1 market window sounds good, but to be honest, the trigger conditions are too vague. It still depends on the market sentiment.
I've seen the kind of price swings triggered by a single tweet before. Every time I say it's the last time, but what happens? Still waiting for the next positive news.
I agree with the judgment that Q2 will be dull. Instead of blindly hoping, it's better to stock up on ammunition and wait for Q3.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 12h ago
Q1 is about to take off, right? But to be honest, right now we're just waiting for a "trigger condition," which sounds like waiting for Godot.
Having policies alone is not enough; someone has to buy. Bitcoin is all about sentiment—one tweet can cause a surge or a crash. It's hilarious.
I believe in just lying flat in Q2; during that period, don't even bother dreaming. Better to have a wave before the end of March and then avoid the awkward period of Q2.
#美联储回购协议计划 Next year’s Q1 may bring a good market window, but the prerequisite is that new trigger conditions need to mature.
The Federal Reserve’s policy orientation after the change in leadership emphasizes growth, and the market’s adjustment of interest rate expectations for next year has basically confirmed an optimistic outlook for the first quarter. But here’s an interesting point — policy implementation takes time to ferment, and sentiment changes often lead fundamental shifts.
Remember the big election a few years ago? Early market pricing of candidates was mainly based on their stance supporting crypto development. During that period, market reactions to related statements were particularly sensitive; a single tweet could move prices, demonstrating the power of short-term sentiment pricing. Risk assets’ attitude towards policymakers is essentially a form of emotional management, especially evident in assets like $BTC and $ETH .
If opportunities do not appear as scheduled in the first quarter, then continue to wait for the third quarter — this is based on my judgment of the cycle’s timing. There are basically no expectations for the second quarter, as various buffering factors are not favorable, and performance expectations are rather bleak.