Some thoughts on certain news!



Seeing the news that a major institution increased its ETH holdings by 1 billion USD, the only thought that flashed in my mind was: retail investors are about to send more money again.
Over the past three months, I’ve discovered a particularly painful pattern—whenever this institution makes a high-profile statement, the trend of ETH should be questioned, even looked at downward. But this time? Still, a bunch of people heard the word "increase" and immediately chased up at $2,940.
Why am I not that excited? I looked at on-chain data and understood: this institution started accumulating ETH when it was still at $3,400 in early November, and has now bought a total of 580,000 ETH, investing 1.72 billion USD, with an average cost of around $3,208. Now, at $2,940, they are sitting on an unrealized loss of 141 million USD. Even more brutal, they also added leverage—borrowing 8.87 billion USDT from a lending protocol, nearly double leverage.
Many people see this data and go all-in, but it’s important to clarify one thing: institutional buying does not necessarily mean a bottom signal.
What’s the difference? Institutions can absorb paper losses, retail investors cannot. They manage over 10 billion USD, and this 1.7 billion ETH position only accounts for 17%. Even if ETH drops another 50%, their overall account would only lose 8.5%. But retail investors? Fully leveraged positions, if ETH drops another 20%, their accounts could be wiped out.
And there’s an even more painful point: institutions play the waiting game, retail investors play the quick cash game.
They build positions gradually over two months, while retail investors see a tweet and go all in that night, then start panicking when ETH drops to $2,800 the next day. Institutions are calculating cycles, retail investors are waiting for tomorrow’s rise—that’s the fundamental difference.
I have to say something less pleasant: sometimes, institutional increases are just marketing.
History has already taught us that the big crashes and project collapses in crypto often show that what you think is a bottom might just be when they need liquidity.
In plain words: the positive news you see might just be a signal for them to get you in.
Ask yourself three more realistic questions: Is this money really idle? Can you calmly watch it drop another 30%? Do you have the patience to wait 3 to 6 months? If the answer is no, don’t act.
If you really want to participate, don’t just copy institutional conclusions—learn from their tactics. For example, if you have 100,000 RMB to buy ETH, don’t buy it all at once. Buy 30% at the current price, if it drops another 10%, buy another 30%, and keep the remaining 40% for the final buy.
And always have a bottom line: if you bought at $2,940, then sell if it drops to $2,500. It’s okay to be wrong, preserving your principal is the real skill. Wait for the true bottom.
Remember this last sentence: institutional buying is just their show, not your reference. Your task isn’t to participate in this play, but to survive and see the next round.

Take it slow... only by living long can you see it.
ETH0,32%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Contains AI-generated content
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)