#数字资产市场动态 BTC has been oscillating within a strong support zone recently. From a technical perspective, it has tested the bottom three times and each time it has held steady, indicating that the bulls still have strength. This zone is suitable for buying on dips and going long; from a probability standpoint, it is a relatively safe strategy.

Compared to previous cycles, this bull market has been significantly extended—what's the main reason? Large-scale institutional entry has changed the game rules. The increase in capital volume, coupled with the Federal Reserve's rate cut cycle still far from ending, these factors together mean there's no need to worry about a bear market arriving early. The real situation is that the market's volatility will gradually decrease, but the market size will only continue to expand. This is the inevitable evolutionary path for BTC.

However, for many traders, the experience during this period can be summed up in two words: uncomfortable. Either small profits are wiped out by big losses, or they get caught in repeated washouts and grid-like oscillations, making it hard to find a good profit logic. The root cause is straightforward—small price fluctuations combined with irregular oscillations, and frequent trading can actually cause the most damage.

From an asset allocation perspective, the current judgment is: Bitcoin below 90,000 CNY has a very high cost-performance ratio. I really can't think of any other investment asset that combines appreciation and preservation attributes better. Gold sounds good, but physical costs are high and its appreciation space has a ceiling. In contrast, Bitcoin's long-term logic is digital gold; its volume will inevitably expand, and its price will also rise. Instead of spreading out idle funds into other financial products, it’s more reliable to make a regular investment in BTC.

What about the current strategic combination? Short-term traders should mainly focus on buying on dips, but if you lack the energy to monitor the market daily, grid trading is worth a try. Practical data shows that a conservative portfolio can achieve a monthly return of over 10%, while a more aggressive portfolio can yield even higher returns, provided that risk exposure is always kept in check.