Can META really call itself a META if 65-70% of crypto Twitter isn't actually turning a profit from it? That's the real question. When the majority of participants are underwater, what does that say about the actual utility and value proposition? Seems like the narrative doesn't match the reality on the ground.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockblindvip
· 7h ago
NGL, this is just a game of hot potato. A 70% loss and still have the nerve to boast about utility... LOL
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivorvip
· 7h ago
Haha, you're so right. Most people are losing money, so what's there to boast about the metaverse?
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollectorvip
· 7h ago
There are so many people losing money to this extent that no matter what Meta says, it all seems pale in comparison.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollectorvip
· 7h ago
ngl, this is the common problem in the crypto world—telling a great story, but in the end, looking at the wallet, all the capital is lost...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)