When it comes to investment choices in the NFT sector, instead of frequently chasing various project tokens, it is better to focus on the infrastructure layer. Ethereum and Solana, as the core underlying public chains of the NFT ecosystem, carry the largest trading volume and ecosystem activity. The token value of these two chains is more derived from network effects and long-term development potential. Flow, on the other hand, specializes in the gaming NFT field, focusing on the liquidity of gaming assets and ecosystem construction. In comparison, choosing these types of infrastructure tokens not only diversifies risk but also allows for better capture of the growth dividends of the entire sector, rather than being driven by the fluctuations of a single project. The stability of these underlying assets is obviously superior to that of small project tokens with weaker liquidity.

ETH-0.27%
SOL-0.75%
FLOW2.13%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainArchaeologistvip
· 14h ago
This logic sounds right, but are there really that many people who can resist the temptation of ETH and SOL's sideways movement? The joy of chasing hot topics is in that very moment.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartendervip
· 14h ago
You're right, chasing concept coins is really exhausting; it's better to focus on infrastructure. I respect this logic; the underlying ecosystem is indeed much more stable, and it's less likely to be manipulated by the fluctuations of small projects. Eth and Sol have long proven themselves; Flow's focus on gaming is truly visible, and compared to those flashy new coins, the infrastructure coin track has even greater potential for imagination. Damn, I used to be the kind of person who chased project after project; thinking back, I was such an idiot.
View OriginalReply0
StableCoinKarenvip
· 14h ago
Nah, listen to me, buy and hold on mainstream public chains is much better than chasing highs and selling lows.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetectivevip
· 14h ago
To be honest, they're starting to cut the leeks again... Infrastructure coins are indeed more resistant to declines, but this logic falls apart in a bear market.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetFreeloadervip
· 14h ago
It should have been said this way earlier: chasing project tokens is a gambling mentality; sticking with infrastructure like ETH and SOL is more reliable.
View OriginalReply0
ChainChefvip
· 14h ago
ngl, building your portfolio like a proper mise en place instead of throwing everything into the wok at once... that's the move. eth and sol are literally the stock vegetables here—can't go wrong with them simmering away long term
Reply0
PretendingSeriousvip
· 14h ago
It sounds nice, but how many people truly dare to go all-in on infrastructure coins? Most are just looking to make quick money by riding the wave when prices go up.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)